Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Smith
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/3/06
HB
SHORT TITLE Driver’s License Foreign National Records
SB 622
ANALYST
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
FY08
$0.1*
$0.1* Recurring Motor Vehicle
Operation Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
*The revenue is dependent on the number of foreign national applicants and the fee to be determined by
TRD. The legislation calls for the fee to pay for the administrative impact for carrying out provisions of
the bill.
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY06
FY07
FY08 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
$90.0 -
$450.0
$150.0 -
$250.0
$150.0 -
$250.0
$390.0-
$590.0 Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 622 would require foreign nationals to provide driving records and finger prints for
identification purposes when applying for a New Mexico driver’s license.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 622 – Page
2
The Motor Vehicle Division (MVD) would be required to conduct a background check on all
foreign national applicants for the purpose of verifying their identity. The bill also requires the
applicant to pay a fee, to be determined by MVD, to cover the costs of the background checks.
A driver’s license issued to a foreign national before July 1, 2006, would no longer be valid
unless the person submits a set of fingerprints to MVD. A foreign national who has a US issued
visa or other valid immigration documentation does not need to submit to fingerprinting.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Due to administrative requirements, the fiscal impact could be significant. Please see “adminis-
trative impact” section below.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to DPS, approximately 30,000 background checks might be submitted to the depart-
ment for processing. This translates to approximately 5,000 labor hours at an estimated cost of
$18.00 an hour, inclusive of benefits, totaling $90 thousand, which will have to be absorbed.
This legislation may require more FTE to handle the additional workload.
TRD estimates total administrative and implementation costs at approximately $450,000 in the
first year with reoccurring costs of $150,000 in subsequent years. Currently, MVD has 20 elec-
tronic fingerprinting machines for Commercial Drivers License (CDL) requirements. If all state
operated MVD offices are required to fingerprint foreign nationals under the provisions of
SB622, an additional 14 machines will be needed. The current cost per fingerprinting unit is
$16,000. To meet the requirement, MVD would require over $250,000 for machines and main-
tenance agreements. Additional costs include: training at approximately $50,000, identity veri-
fication at approximately $50,000, and additional staff support at approximately $150,000.
TRD reports that enactment of SB 622 will require more FTE to handle the workload and train-
ing to meet fingerprinting standards and record requirements. Additional processing for identity
verification will be required through an international, federal or state repository of appropriate
identification information. A system to assure standardization of fingerprinting and identity veri-
fication will be necessary, and a system for appeals of licensing denials will be required.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
TRD has identified the following issues related to implementation of this legislation:
“other documents” (Page 2, line 20) should be defined and compared to those acceptable
documents other jurisdictions will accept in the driver license compact that the American As-
sociation of Motor Vehicle Administrators has published for jurisdiction review and accep-
tance.
“certified copy.” (Page 2, line 25) If the copy comes from another jurisdiction or country,
what certification guidelines are there to follow.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 622 – Page
3
“together with an English language translation of the record . . .” (Page 3, line 1) MVD em-
ployees will have a difficult time determining if documentation is correct and authentic. Re-
cords can come from any country in the world.
“. . . jurisdiction where the applicant is currently or was previously licensed;” (Page 3, lines 3
and 4) will require MVD, under the REAL ID Act, to verify each document with the issuing
agency. This will be labor and time intensive.
Page 3, paragraph (2) – no guidance is provided regarding the system to check the prints.
Are they to go to the NM DPS for their analysis, to the FBI, or to whom. Also not addressed
is/are the receiving entity(s) who will be doing the background check (also not defined as to
what the background check is to consist of) are willing or capable of taking on a new re-
quirement not linked/required by federal legislation. There is no mention as to the mecha-
nism to notify MVD if the person passes or fails the background check.
Page 3, lines10 and 11. As worded, does this mean that if a person comes up wanted, the re-
sults of the background check could not be used to prosecute the individual.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
DPS has forwarded SB 622 to the FBI for their review. It is imperative that they approve the
statutory language to ensure that it meets their requirements under Public Law 92-544.
BE/nt