Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Griego
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/01/06
HB
SHORT TITLE Public Utility Right of Way Width Requirement
SB 534
ANALYST Earnest
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Public Regulation Commission (PRC)
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 534 amends the Public Utility Act at Section 62-1-4 (eminent domain) and Section
62-9-3.2 (right-of-way width) to allow the condemnation of property less than 100 feet in width
for transmission lines without submitting an application to the Public Regulation Commission for
determination of the necessary width for lines or acreage for stations.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
AGO indicates that although transmission line right of way without PRC determination is limited
to 100 feet or less, no numerical cap is placed on the acreage for stations. Under current law, in
order to construct a transmission line and associated facilities on a right of way width in excess
of 100 feet the utility is required to apply to the PRC for determination of the necessary width,
unless the utility and the property owner agree to the width. There is no specific reference cur-
rently in § 62-1-4 to stations; they are regarded as “associated facilities.”
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The legislation could result in the adjudication of fewer right of way cases before the PRC.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 534 – Page 2
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The AGO notes the bill deletes the term “associated facilities” and uses the term “stations” but
leaves it undefined. If the bill is enacted, arguably, there may be no provision authorizing ap-
propriation of property needed for construction or maintenance of facilities not classified as ei-
ther transmission lines or stations.
According to the PRC:
1.
Section 1, paragraph A (page 1, line 25) and Section 2, paragraph B (page 3, line 19) con-
tain apparently contradictory definitions of a transmission line. The language addition in
Section 1, paragraph A (page 1, line 25) uses the term “transmission lines” associated
with the phrase “not exceeding a strip one hundred feet wide”. Section 2, paragraph B
(page 3, line 19), however, defines a “transmission line” as any electric transmission line
requiring a width for right of way of greater than one hundred feet. (Emphasis added.)
2.
In Section 1, paragraph A (page 1, line 25 and page 2, lines 1 and 2) the addition of,
“…an area…sufficient for the physical and design requirements of stations”, leaves the
area to be acquired to be determined by a utility. The only constraint is sufficiency for
the station. In urban areas, acquisition of large area may be controversial or detrimental
to the public interest.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Current law will continue to govern, and PRC determination of right of way widths in excess of
100 feet for both lines and associated facilities will be required unless the parties agree as to the
width.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Should a consistent definition of “transmission line” be added to Section 62-1-4 of the Public
Utility Act.
Should additional conditions such as, “as approved by the commission” or “no more than one
acre in urban areas and no more than 5 acres in rural areas, without prior approval of the com-
mission” be added to the suggested changes.
Should the term “stations” be explicitly defined.
BE/mt