Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Smith
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/3/06
HB
SHORT TITLE Department of Health Hospital Gross Receipts
SB 527
ANALYST Schardin
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
FY08
(4,023.8) Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB674.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 527 provides a gross receipts tax credit for hospitals licensed by the Department of
Health (for-profit hospitals). The credit equals one third of the state gross receipts tax rate in
FY08, two-thirds of the state gross receipts tax rate in FY09, and the entire state gross receipts
tax rate in FY10 and beyond.
The bill will be applicable to tax reporting periods after July 1, 2006.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
All of the state’s for-profit hospitals are currently located within municipal areas, where the state
tax rate is 3.775 percent. Therefore, the credit will eliminate the state gross receipts tax paid by
for-profit hospitals once it is fully phased in. The bill holds local governments harmless, so for-
profit hospitals will still pay a little over 1 percent local gross receipts tax.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 527 – Page
2
A New Mexico Hospital Association survey on hospital gross receipts payments for FY05 indi-
cates that for-profit hospitals paid gross receipts tax of $16.4 million, of which about $9.9 mil-
lion went to the state. Assuming that the impacted tax base will grow by 7 percent each year, the
credit will reduce general fund revenue by about $4,023.8 thousand in FY08, $8,611.0 thousand
in FY09 and $13,824.3 thousand once it is fully phased-in in FY10.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The bill effectively reduces the gross receipts tax paid by for-profit hospitals from 50 percent of
the normal state rate to nothing once it is fully phased-in in FY10.
About half of New Mexico’s 42 hospitals are for-profit. For-profit hospitals compete with non-profit
hospitals in New Mexico and hospitals in neighboring states that do not pay gross receipts tax. The
New Mexico Hospital Association reports that this bill will remove a competitive disadvantage
against New Mexico’s for-profit hospitals.
According to the NMHA, rural hospitals have no choice but to absorb the costs of uncompensated
care for patients who cannot pay. In addition, it is difficult for for-profit hospitals to pass gross re-
ceipts tax on to consumers because Medicare will not reimburse for it.
DOH believes removing the gross receipts tax from for-profit hospitals will make them more profit-
able and could allow them to provide enhanced services in New Mexico.
The proportion of for-profit hospitals has increased over last few years because for-profit hospitals
have more access to capital.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD reports they will experience moderate administration impacts due to this bill. TRD will
need to revise forms, educate taxpayers, train personnel, and modify audit processes.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 527 relates to House Bill 674, which creates the same gross receipts tax credit but
phases it in over two years instead of three.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The bill’s effective date is July 1, 2006, but the way the bill is drafted the credit will not take ef-
fect until July 1, 2007. This may be a drafting error.
TRD notes that the credit could be taken by hospitals after the deduction in Section 7-9-73.1
NMSA 1978, but it is unclear if the credit could be taken before or after the deduction in Section
7-9-93 NMSA 1978. A taxpayer may be able to claim the credit for receipts that are also eligible
for the deduction in Section 7-9-93 NMSA 1978. TRD suggests amending page 2, lines 10-11
and 15-16 to read “after all applicable deductions have been taken.”
pg_0003
Senate Bill 527 – Page
3
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
TRD noted that receipts from the health industry have historically grown more quickly than gen-
eral revenue. Deducting services from high-growth sectors such as health care from the existing
tax base makes it harder for tax revenue growth to keep pace with inflation.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
In December 2005, NMHA told the Revenue Stabilization and Tax Policy Committee that there
is a trend of hospitals converting from non-profit to for-profit because for-profit hospitals have
better access to capital. Hospitals that have converted tend to be older, smaller facilities in small
communities that cannot afford to make improvements through bond issuances or other financing
sources. Does better access to capital give for-profit hospitals a competitive advantage over non-
profit hospitals.
SS/nt