Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR Papen

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

2/3/06

HB

SHORT TITLE NMSU Animal & Food Testing Laboratory

SB 243

ANALYST Earp

APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)

Appropriation

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY06

FY07

$1,000.0 Non-Recurring

General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Duplicates Senate Bill 243

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

Responses Received From

Higher Education Department (HED)

New Mexico State University (NMSU)

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

Senate Bill 243 appropriates $1,000,000 from the General Fund to the Board of Regents of New

Mexico State University (NMSU) to establish an animal and food testing laboratory.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

The appropriation of $1,000,000 contained in this bill would provide start-up funding for the

proposed animal and food testing laboratory. NMSU reports that these funds would be used to

upgrade an existing university laboratory facility, equip the lab with state-of-the-art testing

equipment and supplies, and fund salary and fringe benefits for two professional PhD or MS-

level laboratory scientists/supervisors, graduate assistants and undergraduate research aids. A

fee-based service structure and enhanced research project funding would fund the laboratory af-

ter the first year’s state and university investment. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance

remaining from this non-recurring start-up appropriation at the end of fiscal year 2007 shall re-

vert to the general fund.

Senate Bill 243 – Page

2

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

NMSU submitted this project to the Higher Education Department (HED) for review as a com-

ponent of priority #4 out of 9 requests for program expansion. HED has not included this request

in its fiscal year 2007 funding recommendations.

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

NMSU would administer the appropriation contained in this bill, as well as the proposed testing

laboratory. Following the initial start-up period, administrative costs are expected to be covered

through fee-based testing revenues and research funds.

CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP

House Bill 135 (as originally introduced) and Senate Bill 243 are duplicate measures.

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

NMSU states that an exciting opportunity exists to create a cross-campus, state-of-the-art animal

and food testing facility at NMSU that will meet industry demands, generate highly-skilled

graduates needed by industry and government, identify new research opportunities and generate

revenue for program development. The New Mexico horse racing, livestock, dairy, chile, onion

and pecan industries now spend over $1 million a year for testing services at out-of-state labora-

tories. Representatives of these industries have indicated that they support the development of a

New Mexico facility and are anxious to use its services. Expected benefits of the proposed facil-

ity include:

•

Building a stronger and more industry-responsive university

•

Channeling testing revenues back into the State

•

Bolstering economic development through creation of high-paying jobs and attraction of

new income into the state

•

Providing experiences for students in quality control and bio-security testing, thus provid-

ing them with a competitive advantage in the job market

•

Identifying research topics to which NMSU scientists may apply their expertise

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

Does NMSU have written commitments from anticipated users of the laboratory facility to use

its services.

How much of the $1 million will be devoted to recurring cost during the initial year.

Will NMSU formally commit to operating the proposed facility without state general fund sup-

port after the initial year of operation.

Has a proposed fee structure been developed that is anticipated to generate the revenues required

for a self-sufficient operation.

DKE/mt:nt