Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Altamirano
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/6/06
HB
SHORT TITLE Higher Education Capital Outlay Act
SB 220
ANALYST Kehoe
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
$100,000.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
FY08
$100,000.0
Recurring Higher Education
Capital Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Higher Education Department (HED)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 220 enacts the Higher Education Capital Outlay Act, creates the Higher Education
Capital Council and higher education capital outlay fund, and makes an appropriation.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 220 – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 220 appropriates $100 million from the general fund to the proposed higher educa-
tion capital outlay fund for expenditure in fiscal year 2007 and subsequent fiscal years. Money
in the fund, including earned income, will be credited to the fund and shall not be transferred or
reverted to any other fund at the end of a fiscal year. The money in the fund is appropriated to
the newly created Higher Education Capital Council for the purpose of making grants to institu-
tions for capital outlay projects approved by the Council.
The proposed 2006 General Appropriation Act, as passed out of the House of Representatives,
contains $60 million intended for “deferred maintenance” for institutions of higher education fa-
cilities.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Senate Bill 220 creates a Higher Education Capital Council similar to the Public School Capital
Outlay Task Force. The Council shall consist of the secretary of the Department of Finance and
Administration, the governor, the director of the Legislative Finance Committee, the director of
the Legislative Council Service, the secretary of Higher Education Department, or their desig-
nees; and a representative of a two-year and four-year institution, appointed by the governor.
The Council is required to investigate all applications for assistance from the fund and certify the
approved applications for allocations from the fund.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
One of New Mexico’s most significant capital obligations is its investment in the campuses of
higher education and special schools. The fixed assets of land, buildings, infrastructure, and
equipment at the campuses within the public post secondary education system are instrumental to
the institutions of higher education fulfilling their mission to deliver education, training, and
other services to its students and communities.
The Legislature has authorized $316.5 million for post-secondary and special school facilities
between 1998 and 2005. At least 70 percent of the funding has been for infrastructure and reno-
vation, American with Disability Act improvements, information technology and equipment, and
at least 30 percent for new construction.
The Legislature authorizes the funding of larger, more costly capital improvements for higher
education projects from general obligation bond capacity available only in even-years. Local
funds, which are usually local general obligation bonds issued by the two-year colleges, have
contributed significantly towards capital needs at their campuses to pay for campus improve-
ments such as childcare centers, student activity buildings and student recreational facilities.
University system revenue bonds are generally used to pay for projects such as dormitories, stu-
dent union buildings, stadiums, parking garages, UNM Hospital, other revenue-generating facili-
ties or for capital improvements.
Each institution’s operating budget includes an annual allotment for building renewal and re-
placement (BR&R). BR&R is determined by a formula based upon square footage, age, and past
improvements made to the instructional and administrative buildings on the campus. National
pg_0003
Senate Bill 220 – Page
3
guidelines and standards recommend institutions set aside from two to three percent of the re-
placement cost of buildings for determining the cost for keeping facilities in good operating con-
dition which would require $36 million annually for the state’s facilities. However, the current
BR&R formula only generates 40 percent of the recommended funding.
The buildings and infrastructure at the state’s campuses require a substantial investment for “de-
ferred maintenance and renewal,” a term that refers to the slow deterioration of facilities along
with a backlog of necessary repairs and maintenance. Most campuses require extensive infra-
structure replacements or improvements for heating and cooling, water and sewer improvements,
metering and energy management systems, electrical distribution systems, fiber optic cabling and
other communications systems, and other improvements to eliminate fire and safety code
deficiencies.
The backlog of repairs and renovations along with the lack of adequate funding has resulted in
the minimum performance of repairs and maintenance necessary to keep buildings at a “safe and
healthy” level for students and staff. More and more campuses are suffering from frequent util-
ity outages, unusable classrooms, a loss of students, and discouraged faculty members.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
This bill duplicates Senate Bill 262 in its entirety.
LMK/nt