Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Sharer
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/23/06
HB
SHORT TITLE Electronic Card Reader Tax Credit
SB 215
ANALYST Francis
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
FY08
(4.0)
(8.0)
(8.0) Recurring
General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 215 raises the amount for an existing credit for the purchase of electronic age verifi-
cation equipment used by alcohol and tobacco retailers to $1,000. The credit is currently set at
$300. The new credit may be applied for beginning in tax year 2006.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
According to the Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD), the impact of raising the credit from
$300 to $1,000 will be $8,000 per tax year. Since the amount is for a tax year, the fiscal impact
in FY06, which contains six months of tax year 2006, is $4 thousand. The impact for FY07 and
beyond is $8 thousand.
TRD reported that only $900 in credits have been claimed by three taxpayers in 2003 and 2004.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 215 – Page 2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
TRD notes:
The usual practice in establishing tax credits is to provide a credit for a specified percent-
age of the cost of a targeted category of spending. The investment credit for manufactur-
ers, for example, provides credits at the rate of 5 percent of the qualified expenditure.
This credit is a fixed dollar amount, regardless of the cost of equipment. It is unclear to
what extent the equipment purchases are being subsidized by the tax credits.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD reports that since the credit is already in place and the only parameter changing is the
amount of the credit, there should be no additional administrative burdens.
NF/mt