Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Nava
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/6/06
214/06 HB
SHORT TITLE Supplemental Services For Public Schools
SB 100/aSEC/aSPAC/aHEC
ANALYST Aguilar
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
See Fiscal Implications
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Public Education Department (PED)
Office of Educational Accountability (OEA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HEC Amendment
The House Education Committee amendment makes technical language corrections by providing
that supplemental services will be provided to Title I eligible students.
Synopsis of SPAC Amendment
The Senate Public Affairs Committee amendment to Senate Bill 100 as amended strikes the re-
quirement that providers of supplemental services use only tutors with bachelor’s degrees and
instead provides for a sliding fee schedule based on the educational level of tutors.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
As noted below, high quality teachers have been found to improve student performance and
achievement. This amendment removes the requirement that tutors have bachelor’s degrees in
order to serve as tutors which may lower the quality of tutoring being received by students.
The sliding scale appears to provide for additional compensation for tutors with more advanced
degrees.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 100/aSEC/aSPAC/aHEC – Page
2
Synopsis of SEC Amendment
The Senate Education Committee amendment to Senate Bill 100 removes the requirement that
contractors providing supplemental services hire only licensed teachers as tutors, and provides
instead that tutors must have a bachelor’s degree to provide these services.
The amendment further changes the requirement that public schools failing to make adequate
yearly progress for three or more consecutive years provide supplemental services to Title I stu-
dents and will provide these services to eligible students.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The amendment refers to eligible students, however it does not specify what groups of students if
any are considered eligible.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 100 requires PED to adopt rules that require providers of supplemental educational
services (SES) approved for contracts in New Mexico to use only licensed teachers as tutors. It
also requires providers to use a common pre - and post-assessment instrument prescribed by the
PED to measure gains that students achieve through SES.
The bill also makes technical corrections to language.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
SB 100 carries no appropriation. According to PED and the US Department of Education, dis-
tricts have several options available to fund SES. These include funds from state, local or private
sources, as well as federal sources.
The Office of Educational Accountability notes that between federal FY 2003 and 2005, New
Mexico received nearly $315 million in Title I funds. NCLB requires that all states, including
New Mexico, spend a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 20 percent of its allocation on SES. For
the past three federal fiscal years, New Mexico has had, at minimum, approximately $15.7 mil-
lion available in federal Title I funds to support SES. According to the Supplemental Educa-
tional Services Quality Center (SESQC), a national oversight group that monitors SES issues,
there are 125 Title I Schools Identified for Improvement and there are 89 Title I schools that are
required to provide SES. The amount received per school district is determined by the US De-
partment of Education and is distributed by PED.
The exact fiscal impact cannot be determined; however, effects can be expected in two areas:
There is the potential for increased fees charged by providers of SES services in order to
offset costs associated with hiring certified staff, if they are not already doing so. Be-
cause the total dollar amount available per student is capped, any increased costs would
result in fewer tutoring sessions per student.
Costs associated with a common assessment could be met in a number of ways depending
on whether the assessment is a single statewide assessment or an assessment specific to
each district, such as a district short-cycle assessment that may already be in use.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 100/aSEC/aSPAC/aHEC – Page
3
Based on information from the PED website, during the 2005/2006 school year, fees for different
providers ranged from $18.00/hour (for a minimum of two hours) to $1,175.00 per student for an
entire school year. The local school district exercises the discretion as to how the funds are
spent.
According to PED, New Mexico currently has 27 approved SES vendors. Some vendors provide
statewide coverage and others focus on specific school districts or regions. In addition, these
vendors include both in-state and out-of-state businesses.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
High quality teachers have been found to improve student performance and achievement. The
requirement that tutors be licensed teachers may enhance student opportunities to improve profi-
ciency.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
It is unclear from the wording of the proposed amendment whether tutors would be required to
be licensed teachers in the State of New Mexico or whether, in the case of out-of-state providers,
that licensure in another state would be sufficient.
PED notes that Line 9 on page 4 makes reference to Title I students. As Section 22-2C-7 applies
to all public schools, including non-Title I schools, the department suggests for the Legislature to
consider removing this language.
PA/yr:mt:nt