Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Nava
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2-5-06
2-8-06 HB
SHORT TITLE School District 40-year Water Plans
SB 61/aSEC
ANALYST Woods
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
NFI
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Office of the State Engineer-Interstate Stream Commission (OSE)
Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SEC Amendment
Senate Education Committee amendment to SB61 amends the legislation as follows:
On page 2, line 2, strike ", schools".
On page 2, line 12, strike ", schools".
On page 2, line 17, strike ", schools".,
Senate Education Committee amendment to SB61 adds no appropriation to the legislation.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 61, relating to water, amends a section of the NMSA 1978 to extend eligibility for the
forty-year water use planning period to school districts.
Specifically, the legislation seeks to amend section 72-1-9 NMSA 1978 to extend eligibility for
the 40-year planning period to school districts. School district will be able to acquire future wa-
ter rights if they can demonstrate the need within their water development plan.
There is no appropriation attached to this legislation.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 61/aSEC – Page
2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The Public Education Department (PED) notes that pursuant to section 72-1-1, NMSA 1978 all
natural waters within the State of New Mexico belong to the public and are subject to appropria-
tion for beneficial use. Further, that the future water needs of the state can be met by allowing
each region of the state to plan for its future water. The state can also assist regions in planning
future water use by implementing a state appropriation program as reflected in each region’s wa-
ter use plan. The legislation, PED suggests, will allow school districts to implement a water de-
velopment plan for an appropriation or change of place or purpose of use pursuant to the plan.
PED additionally indicates that, pursuant to section 22-24-5 section 9d NMSA 1978, a school
district must submit a five-year facilities master plan before grant assistance shall be approved by
the Public School Capital Outlay Council, and that a school district may acquire additional costs
in order to implement a water development plan.
Office of the State Engineer-Interstate Stream Commission (OSE) offers a number of observa-
tions, including:
It is the OSE’s estimate that there are over 100 school districts that may be af-
fected by this change. It is unclear how many of these districts currently hold
water rights unused.
It is not uncommon for school districts to obtain their potable water from mu-
nicipal systems (covered entities). The school districts will provide water rights
to supply the outdoor water needs for aesthetic purposes and athletic fields. This
would potentially complicate the 40-year analysis to appropriately separate the
potable component from the outdoor component.
The initial intent of the 72-1-9 statue was to ensure adequate water resources for
“municipal” needs (including domestic, institutional, commercial and industrial
uses). While it is not entirely inconsistent, the purposed amendment seems to
stretch the intent of the statue. Since a large portion of the water needs are for
landscaping and athletic fields, these needs can be greatly reduced though appro-
priate planning. Low water use landscape principles can provide aesthetically
pleasing landscapes, while greatly reducing the need for outdoor water compared
to traditional lawns. Also, the advent of high tech artificial turf for athletic fields,
natural grass is less critical than in the recent past.
Some proponents of this bill have argued that public school districts are similar
to Universities. They conclude that since Universities are covered by the 72-1-9
statue, school districts should enjoy the same status. For the purpose of this
statue, this analogy is not correct. Universities are institutions with different ob-
ligations and missions. For example, they are large campuses that provide year
round living amenities, attracting people from all parts of the state. To plan for
growth within these systems is akin to municipal and counties and other covered
entities in terms of size and scope. Contrast this with most school districts that
only need to provide basic facilities for sanitary, cafeteria, and (potentially)
locker rooms and outdoor water use. The potential future water demands be-
tween the two systems are great.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 61/aSEC – Page
3
In addition to amending § 72-1-9 to add school districts as entities covered by
that statute, SB 61 also adds public utilities supplying water to schools as cov-
ered entities. See page 2, lines 3, 13, and 18. These provisions of SB 61 appear
to go beyond the intent advocated by the bill’s proponents of assisting schools
and school districts that themselves hold water rights. OSE suggests an amend-
ment [included below] to address this concern.
OSE concludes by suggesting that “this legislation does not provide a substitute solution for the
real problem, which is school districts must, like all other entities, acquire water rights in the
market place because, in general, there is no unappropriated water available for new appropria-
tions.”
AMENDMENTS
OSE suggests the following amendments to the legislation:
1. On page 2, line 3, after the word “municipalities, delete the word “schools”.
2. On page 2, line 13, after the word “municipalities,” delete the word “schools”.
3. On page 2, line 18, after the word “municipalities,” delete the word “schools”.
BW/yr