Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Komadina
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1-23-06
2-6-06 HB
SHORT TITLE Increase Certain Medicaid Reimbursements
SB 49
ANALYST Collard
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
$3,150.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates HB 624
Relates to SB 189
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
FY08
N/A
$9,075.8
$9,075.8 Recurring Federal Funds
Match
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
Human Services Department (HSD)
Developmental Disabilities Planning Council (DDPC)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
SUMMARY
Senate Bill 49 appropriates $3,150,000 from the general fund to DOH for the purpose of increas-
ing Medicaid reimbursement rates to developmental disabilities wavier (DD waiver) program
providers.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 49 – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $3,150,000 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY07 shall revert to the gen-
eral fund.
HSD indicates the bill adds administrative costs to HSD to change existing DD waiver reim-
bursement rates and through waiver oversight responsibilities. It is anticipated that approxi-
mately 40 hours of staff time would be required to implement the rate increase. It would further
cost approximately four hours of computer reprogramming time at a cost of $500 to make the
changes. This is a non-recurring cost.
HSD also notes t
he $3,150,000 appropriation would be eligible for federal Medicaid match at the
rate of 71.94
percent,
or approximately $9,075,800, for a total of approximately $12,616,000, de-
pending on the distribution of the appropriation by direct services and administrative costs. DOH
analysis differs, indicating the $3,150,000 appropriation for a DD waiver reimbursement rate in-
crease would be eligible for federal financial participation (FFP) at the blended rate of 72 percent
or $8.1 million. The appropriation with FFP could cover an average rate increase of approxi-
mately 4.8 percent for services delivered by DD waiver providers.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
DOH also notes, as written, language in the bill suggests that DOH may be responsible for the
Medicaid DD waiver program. DOH administers the DD waiver program through a Joint Pow-
ers Agreement with HSD. HSD/Medical Assistance Division (MAD), as the single state agency,
is responsible for Medicaid programs including the establishment of reimbursement rates of ser-
vice providers.
HSD states in past years, DD waiver providers have received rate increases when other providers
such as dentists, pediatricians, and providers of services under the Medically Fragile Medicaid
waiver program, targeted case management, obstetricians/gynecologists, and many others have
not. An appropriation to provide a reimbursement rate increase for only DD waiver providers
has the potential to create access to care issues for other Title XIX services where reimbursement
rates are not increased due to current budgetary constraints. Additionally, an increase in reim-
bursement rates for DD waiver providers would require DOH and HSD/MAD to increase rates
for other providers in order to maintain adequate access to services for other programs. The rate
increases needed to maintain an adequate provider base for other programs would cause a sig-
nificant increase in both DOH and HSD/MAD budgets.
DDPC indicates if Medicaid is not fully funded in FY07 the providers may see another decrease
in reimbursement rates.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
HSD notes a rate increase only for DD waiver providers without changing services to DD waiver
recipients limits the ability of HSD/MAD to determine the most effective way to meet perform-
ance goals and contain Medicaid costs.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 49 – Page
3
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
DOH indicates the increased funding would require updating rate sheets, revised tracking and
billing systems and developing other administrative tools which can be done with existing staff.
A rate study may also be required.
HSD indicates the bill will have administrative implications for HSD to implement rate increases
in both staff time and computer programming time.
HSD/MAD would have to verify and make assurances to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) that the increased reimbursement rate for providers will not increase the waiver
expenditures to the point of exceeding 100 percent of the amount that would be incurred by the
Medicaid program for these individuals, absent the waiver, in a hospital, a nursing facility, or an
Intermediate Care Facility for the Mentally Retarded (ICF/MR).
DUPLICATION, RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 49 duplicates House Bill 624.
Senate Bill 49 relates to Senate Bill 189, which appropriates funds to serve additional individuals
on the Developmental Disabilities waiver. The fiscal analysis of Senate Bill 49 contained herein
is based on current individuals served. If the DD waiver were expanded to serve additional indi-
viduals, the funds allocated in Senate Bill 49 for provider rate increases may be sufficient to pro-
vide a rate increase of less than 4.8 percent because the funds for provider rate increases would
need to be spread across a larger population.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
HPC research indicates the Developmental Disabilities Waiver is a home- and community-based
alternative to institutionalization in an intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded. The
program serves individuals who are diagnosed with developmental disabilities per the state of
New Mexico’s definition, meet the same level of care criteria required for institutional care, and
meet all Medicaid eligibility criteria for income and resources as those served in an institutional
care setting. According to the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, in 2003, approximately 18.1
percent of New Mexicans had some type of disability. Additionally, in FY02, approximately 10
percent of Medicaid enrollees were disabled, and the disabled accounted for 32.8 percent of
Medicaid spending.
With regard to reduction in Medicaid reimbursement rates, HPC states, according the Human
Services Department, provider reimbursement made by the New Mexico Medicaid program, ef-
fective with dates of service July 1, 2004, will be reduced by 1.5 percent. The reduction is said to
be made due to serious Medicaid budget issues such as growing health care costs, the end of the
federal enhanced rate for Medicaid funding, and the reduction of the normal rate of federal
matching due to the increase in New Mexico’s per capita income. The reduction applies to ser-
vices provided under the Developmental Disabilities Waiver.
HPC also indicates the 2002 HPC Physician Survey indicated that physicians are leaving the
state due to the Medicaid reimbursement rate, which was one of the top three reasons given for
leaving.
pg_0004
Senate Bill 49 – Page
4
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
DDPC notes the additional appropriation is much needed to restore the payment rate cuts to pro-
viders. Providers are facing great challenges retaining good quality staff when other local busi-
nesses are paying much more than minimum wage.
KBC/nt