Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Vigil
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/10/06
HB 766
SHORT TITLE Distinguish Student Proficiency From School’s
SB
ANALYST Aguilar
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
See Fiscal Implications
Recurring
Indeterminate
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB-100
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 766 makes changes to language from “students failing to make adequate yearly pro-
gress” to students who are not academically proficient. The bill also aligns the process for the
designation of schools in need of improvement with federal statue and adds language specifying
what types of organizations may provide supplemental services.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Provisions in this bill require that supplemental services to school district students shall be pro-
vided by another school district or by one or more state-approved private organizations as deter-
mined by the department. This requirement may have a significant fiscal impact depending on
the number of school districts requiring these services and the number of students being served.
Senate Bill 100 provides for contractors supplying supplemental services establish a sliding scale
for compensating tutors based on qualifications. If enacted, these bills will have a complemen-
tary fiscal effect.
pg_0002
House Bill 766 – Page 2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The Public Education department notes this bill will bring state legislation into alignment with
NCLB language and with the state’s federally approved accountability workbook.
Provisions in the bill provide for school districts to determine academic proficiency through al-
ternative school-district assessments. On the surface this appears to be a beneficial to the stu-
dent; however a question arises with regard to whether a student can be considered proficient
through alternative means yet not achieve proficiency as measured by the statewide standards
based assessment. Public school support performance measures include the percent of elemen-
tary and middle school students who achieve the annual measurable objectives for proficiency on
standards-based assessments in reading and math. These different requirements seem to be in
opposition to each other.
PA/mt