Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Garcia, M.H.
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2-8-2006
2-9-2006 HB 720/aHAGC
SHORT TITLE Increase Chile Industry Profitability
SB
ANALYST Dearing
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
$140.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico State University College of Agriculture & Home Economics (NMSU)
New Mexico Higher Education Department (NMHED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HAGC Amendments
House Agricultural and Water Resources Committee amends this bill, such that:
1.)
On page 1, line 24, strike “2006” and insert, in lieu thereof “2007”.
Generally, the amendment is intended to increase the time period for program reporting and data
interpretation and makes no substantial change on the fiscal impact of this legislation.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 720 appropriates $140,000 from the general fund to the New Mexico State University
Board of Regents in order to increase the profitability and yield of chile and to increase the eco-
nomic sustainability of the New Mexico chile industry.
pg_0002
House Bill 720/aHAGC – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $140,000 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2007 shall revert
to the general fund.
This request was not on the list of priority projects submitted by NMSU to the New Mexico
Higher Education Department (NMHED) for review. It was not included in the Department’s
funding recommendation for FY07.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
In order to increase the yield and profitability of chile, industry constituents need more efficient
methods of containing costs associated with harvesting, as well as farm-level production costs,
and similarly must increase subsequent sales of this crop. In increased global competition, the
New Mexican Chile industry is facing competitors producing in areas which have substantially
reduced labor economics and essentially non-existent environmental regulation. In essence,
multi-national firms involved in production will choose to relocate processing facilities in prox-
imity to those global areas having the highest levels of production, in turn bringing their costs of
production downward.
Overall, the growth and production of chile in Dona Ana, Luna and Hidalgo counties generates
$418 million in economic activity annually. Crop values are on the range of $60-100 million
annually, depending on production levels and cash price. Production of the crop however, mul-
tiplies the economic impact by a factor of four. In total, the chile industry provides 10,000-
15,000 seasonal harvesting jobs, and over 5300 permanent jobs, in addition to indirect economic
impact. Chile production is both vital economically as well as culturally in New Mexico. Simi-
larly, chile is an integral component in reducing agricultural risks through its role in crop rotation
strategies. As chile is elemental in rotation strategies, a reduction in its production can result in
an increase in banks’ reluctance to provide agricultural loans.
Lastly, tourism and niche product markets are in some part based on cultural links to chile, its
production and consumption.
Without a critical mass of local chile production, there is no reason for the chile processing in-
dustry to remain in New Mexico. Today more than 70% of the cayenne and jalapeno crops are
grown in Mexico. A decade ago most of the chile now imported was available from farms in
southern New Mexico. New Mexico industry and agricultural groups and constituents must con-
tinue to work diligently if New Mexico communities are to avoid the devastation that results
from farms, businesses, jobs and income lost to foreign competition.
Approaches to solve this problem include:
1) Improvement of management practices;
2) Reduction of costs through harvesting system mechanization;
pg_0003
House Bill 720/aHAGC – Page
3
3) Expansion of market opportunities. The greatest short-term return on investment will
come from effectively and efficiently using existing technology and by mechanizing the
harvesting and de-stemming of our peppers.
The Agricultural Experiment Station at New Mexico State University maintains departments that
include expertise in the agronomic, engineering, and economic issues related to the challenges
facing the chile industry in the state. This appropriation could enhance its ability to respond to
the specific needs of protecting the chile growing and processing industries in New Mexico.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
As stated in the bill, by June 30, 2009, NMSU would submit a program evaluation to the Legisla-
tive Finance Committee and NMHED. The evaluation would review the three-year implementa-
tion period and provide a detailed account of all benefits to the state.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Please see “Performance Implications”
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
HB411 and SB363 are related in that they propose funding of $250,000 to allocate to the Board
of Regents of NMSU for the New Mexico Department of Agriculture to fund a marketing cam-
paign to promote out-of-state sales of New Mexico-grown chile and related products.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
This bill calls for the addition of expertise in areas of best management agronomic practices, de-
velopment and testing of mechanical handling equipment, and economic development issues.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Without a critical mass of local chile production, there is no reason for the chile processing in-
dustry to remain in New Mexico. With much of chile being imported to these production facili-
ties, it is not difficult to imagine that multi-national and non-locally owned companies will
evaluate the economics of relocating closer to the source of their raw materials. Losing this sig-
nature crop of the state and the economic benefits that accompany it will cause devastation to
farms and businesses.
PD/nt