Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR Picraux

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

2/1/06

HB 705

SHORT TITLE Domestic Violence Repeat Offender Program

SB

ANALYST McSherry

APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)

Appropriation

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY06

FY07

$422.1

Recurring

General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

This proposed appropriation bill duplicates an appropriation which was included in the HAFC

version of House Bill 2, the General Appropriations Act.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

House Bill 705 appropriates $422,100 from the general fund to the Bernalillo Metropolitan Court

for the purpose of replacing federal and other agency transferred funds for the Court’s “domestic

violence repeat offender program.”

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

The appropriation of $422,100 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund.

Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2007 shall revert

to the general fund.

Although BCMC states that the funding is for “one more year” of funding for the program, the

funds are for operational expenses and for the purposes of the FIR are recurring.

Participation in the Domestic Violence Repeat Offender Program could reduce expenses that

would have been associated with trial, pre-trial preparation and other expenses.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

The Domestic Violence Repeat Offender Program (DVROP), as established, provides services to

House Bill 705 – Page

2

domestic violence repeat offenders, their children and their victims. These services include: one

on one judicial interaction, offender supervision (including sanctions, interventions and encour-

agement), and monitoring (including substance abuse monitoring, counseling), and treatment for

all family members. The program lasts at least 12 months and family member services continue

even if the offender is terminated from the program.

Offenders who complete DVROP have their sentence suspended with their conviction main-

tained as part of their record.

The program has a court clinician, a probation officer and a judicial specialist. Three judges

from the court are involved in the program with no reduction in regular dockets.

According to Metro Court, the DVROP is the only one of its kind in the United States. The pro-

gram received startup funding from CYFD, Corrections and federal sources to begin in July

2004. The program is voluntary, with participants chosen on a case-by-case basis with prefer-

ence given to family units in which all parties can be “served.”

The 2

nd

Judicial District Attorney points out that this program has a limited number of clients

because in order to participate one must not have a prior felony conviction (of any type), or any

pending felony or misdemeanor charges.

Also according to the 2

nd

DA:

The program provides treatment for the entire family including victims and offenders

In the 18 months of program existence it has screened 111 offenders, accepted 60 and

graduated seven.

The PDs office does not encourage clients to apply to the program due to rigorous pro-

gram conditions lasting 12 months, and the rate of dismissal (3 of 4) due to failure of the

victims to cooperate with prosecutors.

Metro court reports that 24 victims and 27 children have received services since the program’s

inception.

PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS

Metro court requests that the program be evaluated over a three year period, after one year of

state funding. Indicators have not been successful, but would be useful to determine the pro-

grams effectiveness.

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

Programs such as DVROP result in additional administrative workload. Metro court is not re-

questing administrative increases associated with the program.

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

Metro Court reports the court has 5,000 domestic violence associated incidents charged in Berna-

lillo County each year and that ˝ of female homicide deaths and a large portion of nonfatal inju-

ries in New Mexico are due to “intimate partner violence.” The court further asserts that 1 in 6

incidents of domestic violence reported by law enforcement involves a child witness (78 percent

under the age of 13).

House Bill 705 – Page

3

CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, RELATIONSHIP

House Bill 705 would duplicate an appropriation adopted by HAFC in the General Appropria-

tions Act.

WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL

The program will either no longer exist, or will be severely limited in scope.

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

1.

What indicators of success does Metro Court propose to determine if this program should

continue.

2.

Would other courts benefit from such a program.

3.

Are funds currently received from Corrections and CYFD no longer available for the

program. How are these agencies involved, if at all in the operations of the program.

4.

What factors are considered in the screening of potential participants.

5.

What reasons were the 51 screened individuals who were not accepted as participants re-

jected for participation.

6.

What proportion of the 53 non-graduate participants is still involved with the DVROP

program.

EM/nt