Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Varela
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/01/06
HB 590
SHORT TITLE Public School Insurance Fund Investments
SB
ANALYST Geisler
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
FY08
NFI.
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Public Schools Insurance Authority (PSIA)
State Investment Council (SIC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 590 expands the Public School Insurance Authority’s investment options with respect
to long-term reserves. This bill would allow the PSIA Board to invest PSIA’s long-term reserves
with either the state investment officer or with a registered investment adviser. Currently, long-
term reserves must be invested with the state investment officer.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
No fiscal impact identified.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
PSIA notes that their long-term reserves are those monies needed to cover outstanding claims. In
the benefits program, these reserves are commonly referred to as “IBNR” (incurred but not re-
ported). In the risk program, these reserves represent the estimate of future settlements of claims
pg_0002
House Bill 590 – Page
2
which are in progress, but have not closed, as well as incurred but not reported. PSIA uses an
actuarial firm to determines the required IBNR reserves. PSIA’s risk program third party admin-
istrator updates the estimated for claim reserves as they are reported and adjudicated.
As of December 31, 2005, PSIA has $30 million in long-term reserves invested with the state
investment officer. The investment portfolio has appreciated by 19.9% since the funds were
placed with the state investment officer in May 2004.
SIC reports that for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, PSIA’s fund under the SIC returned
10.4%, outperforming its total fund benchmark* by 120 basis points or 1.2%, and the S&P 500
by 410 basis points or 4.1%.
PSIA’s asset allocation as of the end of FY05 was:
US Equity 61.8%
Non-US Equity 14.6%
Core Bonds 23.6%
PSIA’s above average performance was influenced significantly in FY05 by its portfolio alloca-
tions in Non-US (14.6%) & Mid/Small Cap US Equities (13.1%).
* Total Fund Benchmark reflects the historical target asset allocation of the fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
SIC states that PSIA’s investment or lack thereof has minimal administrative impact on the SIC.
PSIA notes that investment through the state investment officer involves very little administra-
tive oversight. It is likely more intense oversight would be required by staff if a private firm
were utilized. If the Board wished to explore the option of an outside private investment firm,
staff would be directed to issue a Request for Proposal, evaluate responses, and implement a con-
tract for a four year maximum term. This would create a significant increase in workload for
staff.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The long term investments will continue to be managed by the state investment officer.
GG/mt