Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Park
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/31/2006
2/4/2006 HB 446/aHGUAC
SHORT TITLE Forfeiture of Retirement Benefits for Crimes
SB
ANALYST McOlash
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
Office of the Attorney General (AGO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of the HGUAC Amendment
The House Government and Urban Affairs Committee amendment to HB 446 adds the word
“accumulated” and the phrase “any unexpended accumulate member contributions to the for-
feited member” when referring to the refund of member contributions. The bill, as introduced
defines member contributions as the amounts deducted from a member’s salary and credited to
the member’s account, plus interest.
If a conviction is overturned, the member may reinstate forfeiture service credit and the system
shall waive any “membership” requirements for the purchase.
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 446 provides for the forfeiture of present or future retirement benefits when a state
officer or employee is convicted of a felony offense related to his public duties (e.g. NMSA
1978, §§ 30-24-1; 30-24-2; 10-16-4; N.M. Const. art. IV, § 39).
The bill also provides certain definitions including “conviction” (which includes a plea of nolo
contendre), “felony offense,” and “forfeited member” and enhances the penalties for certain fel-
ons (members or retired members of state retirement programs) and felonies (arising from con-
pg_0002
House Bill 446/aHGUAC - Page
2
duct related to public employment).
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
AGO
House Bill 446 provides for forfeiture of pension benefits from any state retirement system upon
a finding that a defendant in a criminal proceeding has been convicted of a state or federal felony
arising out of conduct related to a member or retired member’s public employment. Provisions
apply to all the various state retirement funds.
If the member is not retired, the right to draw future payments is forfeited.
If the member is already retired, the bill provides that payments cease.
In either event, member contributions will be returned to the forfeited member.
The bill requires a judicial determination in accordance with similar forfeiture statutes. If enacted
it would require a single, yet bifurcated, trial on the allegations of the criminal offenses and the
civil forfeiture. It provides that the rules of criminal procedure will apply to the former and the
rules of civil procedure will apply to the latter. The bill also provides “clear and convincing evi-
dence” as the burden of proof. If a person is convicted of any such an offense in federal court or
the court of another state, the district attorney or attorney general may proceed with forfeiture in
the New Mexico courts. Alternative venues are designated in the bill
The bill makes provisions for the protection of previously vested community property rights and
child support obligations under NMSA 1978, §§ 10-11-136; 10-11-136.1; 10-28-7; 10-12B-7,
10-12C-7 and 22-11-42.
PERA
While HB 446 defines felony as “a crime designated by law as a felony or a crime for which the
authorized penalty is imprisonment for a year or more,” the court makes the determination
whether a felony arises from conduct related to public employment. If so, the court may order
forfeiture. Many crimes are designated a felony which may “arise from conduct relating to pub-
lic employment,” such as possession of a personal use amount of a controlled substance at work.
It is a policy decision for the legislature whether such a crime fall within the purview of anti-
corruption legislation. Many states, including California, Florida, Michigan and Pennsylvania,
have forfeiture of retirement benefit statutes specific only to felonies relating to the misuse of
public monies (bribes, extortion, theft of public money, embezzlement of public money, forgery,
etc.).
Colorado subjects public pensions to legal process if the retirement system member is required to
pay restitution for theft, embezzlement, misappropriation, or wrongful conversion of public
property or for willful and intentional violations of fiduciary duties where the offender received a
financial gain. HB 446 does not subject public pensions to legal process for restitution
.
pg_0003
House Bill 446/aHGUAC - Page
3
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
House Bill 446 conflicts with the PERA Act [NMSA 1978, Section 10-11-4 (F)], requiring that
an individual be a “member” in order to reinstate forfeited service credit.
The Judicial Retirement Act [NMSA 1978, Section 10-12B-17] provides for the forfeiture of
pension benefits if a member is removed from office pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, Sec-
tion 32 of the Constitution of New Mexico.
The Magistrate Retirement Act [NMSA 1978, Section 10-12C-16] provides for the forfeiture of
pension benefits if a member is removed from office pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, Sec-
tion 32 of the Constitution of New Mexico.
The Public Employees Retirement Act [NMSA 1978, Section 10-11-136] allows for court
ordered division of retirement funds as community property.
The Public Employees Retirement Act [NMSA 1978, Section 10-11-136.1] allows legal process
to satisfy child support obligations.
The Judicial Retirement Act [NMSA 1978, 10-12B-7] allows for court ordered division of re-
tirement funds as community property and legal process to satisfy child support obligations.
The Magistrate Retirement Act [NMSA 1978, 10-12C-7] allows for court ordered division of
retirement funds as community property and legal process to satisfy child support obligations.
Current statute (Chapter 31, Article 18) provides the sentencing authority and the basic sentences
for noncapital felonies.
31-18-15. Sentencing authority; noncapital felonies; basic sentences and fines;
parole authority; meritorious deductions.
A.
If a person is convicted of a noncapital felony, the basic sentence of imprisonment
is as follows:
(1) for a first degree felony resulting in the death of a child, life imprisonment;
(2) for a first degree felony, eighteen years imprisonment;
(3) for a second degree felony resulting in the death of a human being, fifteen
years imprisonment;
(4) for a second degree felony for a sexual offense against a child, fifteen years
imprisonment;
(5) for a second degree felony, nine years imprisonment;
(6) for a third degree felony resulting in the death of a human being, six years
imprisonment;
(7)
for a third degree felony for a sexual offense against a child, six years
imprisonment;
(8) for a third degree felony, three years imprisonment; or
(9) for a fourth degree felony, eighteen months imprisonment.
B. The appropriate basic sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed upon a person
convicted and sentenced pursuant to Subsection A of this section, unless the court
alters the sentence pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-18-15.1, 31-18-16, 31-
pg_0004
House Bill 446/aHGUAC - Page
4
18-16.1 or 31-18-17 NMSA 1978. The Criminal Sentencing Act (Chapter 31, Article
18 NMSA 1978), among other things, includes provisions for criminal sentencing.
31-18-13. Sentencing authority; all crimes.
A. Unless otherwise provided in this section, all persons convicted of a crime under the
laws of New Mexico shall be sentenced in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal
Sentencing Act [Chapter 31, Article 18 NMSA 1978]; provided, that a person sentenced
as a serious youthful offender or as a youthful offender may be sentenced to less than the
basic or mandatory sentence prescribed by the Criminal Sentencing Act.
B. Whenever a defendant is convicted of a crime under the constitution of New Mex-
ico, or a statute not contained in the Criminal Code [30-1-1 NMSA 1978], which
specifies the penalty to be imposed on conviction, the court shall set as a definite
term of imprisonment the minimum term prescribed by the statute or constitutional
provision and may impose the fine prescribed by the statute or constitutional provi-
sion for the particular crime for which the person was convicted; provided, that a
person sentenced as a serious youthful offender or as a youthful offender may be
sentenced to less than the minimum term of imprisonment prescribed by the statute
or the constitutional provision.
C. A crime declared to be a felony by the constitution or a statute not contained in the
Criminal Code [30-1-1 NMSA 1978], without specification of the sentence or fine to be
imposed on conviction, shall constitute a fourth degree felony as prescribed under the
Criminal Code [30-1-1 NMSA 1978] for the purpose of the sentence, and the defendant
shall be so sentenced.
D. Any other crime for which the sentence to be imposed upon conviction is not speci-
fied shall constitute, for the purpose of the sentence, a petty misdemeanor.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Persons convicted of felony offense, under selected retirement systems, will be able to draw state
retirement benefits despite the misconduct associated with their public duties.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Certain New Mexico retirement systems statutes have provisions for the forfeiture of retirement
benefits. The right to receive a pension pursuant to the provisions of the Judicial Retirement Act
[10-12B-1 NMSA 1978] shall be forfeited if the member is removed from office pursuant to the
provisions of Article 6, Section 32 of the constitution of New Mexico and the member's only en-
titlement from the fund shall be the refund of the member's own contributions
.
Would it be more prudent to address, in a similar manner, those systems that do not have
such provisions.
pg_0005
House Bill 446/aHGUAC - Page
5
Should the provisions in the other retirement system statutes, for the protection of previ-
ously vested community property rights and child support, be amended to coincide with
the other statutes.
The AGO indicates this legislation will not be applicable to one who is indicted for a felony of-
fense, enters a plea of guilty or nolo contendre and then receives a conditional discharge from the
court. NMSA 1978, § 30-20-13. Is this what the author of HB 446 intended.
The procurement code has a requirement that all contracts and solicitations therefore shall con-
tain reference to the criminal laws prohibiting bribes, gratuities and kickbacks (13-1-191). How
are violations of this provision determined and how is this provision enforced. Should a
similar provision also apply to cases involving felonies in violation of public duties.
Although the forfeiture of retirement benefits will require a bifurcated trial on the
allegations of the criminal offenses and the civil forfeiture, is the state introducing a second
prosecution for the same crime once the first one is totally finished and decided.
AMENMENTS
As recommended by PERA:
1. On page 4, line 22, after "refund" insert "accumulated".
2. On page 5, line 2, after "refund" insert "any unexpended accumulated".
3. On page 5, line 3, strike "less any pension amounts received".
4.
On page 5, line 23, before "requirement" insert "membership".
Add a section similar to current law:
30-1-13. Accessory.
A person may be charged with and convicted of the crime as an accessory if he
procures, counsels, aids or abets in its commission and although he did not di-
rectly commit the crime and although the principal who directly committed such
crime has not been prosecuted or convicted, or has been convicted of a different
crime or degree of crime, or has been acquitted, or is a child under the Children's
Code [32A-1-1 NMSA 1978].
BMC/mt