Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR Silva

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

1-30-2006

HB 420

SHORT TITLE Increase Disabled Parking Penalties

SB

ANALYST Dearing

REVENUE (dollars in thousands)

Estimated Revenue

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY06

FY07

FY08

Minimal

Recurring General Fund

*Please See Narrative

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Duplicates SB 444

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

Responses Received From

Governor’s Commission on Disabilities

Developmental Disabilities Planning Council

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

House Bill 420 to increases penalties for illegal parking in designated parking for accessible

spaces. This bill also re-affirms authority for local law enforcement personnel to issue citations

for violations in their respective jurisdictions on public and private property. Specifically, the

legislation increases penalties from $100 (one hundred dollars) to $250 (two hundred fifty dol-

lars) for illegal parking in designated parking for accessible spaces.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

Overall fiscal impact incurred by the enactment of this legislation would be determined by the

volume of actual occurrences of illegal parking. Additionally, there could be some increases in

costs to applicable enforcement bodies. The fiscal impact on the judiciary would be proportional

to the enforcement of this law and commenced prosecutions. There is potential of increased

House Bill 420 – Page

2

caseloads in the courts, however this must be offset by additional revenues received from in-

creased fines provided by this bill.

*While an accurate approximation of the change to revenue is difficult determine, in general, it is

inferred that there would be an increase of 150% above current revenue through this source, due

to a similar increase in fines. Potential increases in the frequency of the issuance of tickets, the

basic intention of this legislation, would have a subsequent positive impact on revenue as well.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

This legislation is proposed in light of:

•

Growing concerns that individuals are illegally parking in spaces reserved for individuals

with disabilities.

•

Local law enforcement’s reluctance to cite to individuals on private property.

•

Disabled Person’s inability to find or utilize parking due to illegal use by individuals

without disabilities’

•

Increases in revenue from collection of such violators, however, expanded enforcement

and prosecution of illegal parking would have associated cost increases, to be offset by

collection of fines.

PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS

This legislation has the effect of:

•

Discouraging individuals from parking illegally;

•

Reaffirming to local law enforcement that they have the authority to issue citations on

private property without the property owner’s permission;

•

Removing the convenience of simply sending in a fine and have violators appear before a

judge; and

•

Reaffirming authority of parking personnel to issue citations on State colleges and uni-

versities.

The Governor’s Commission on Disability will concentrate efforts in its training to educate the

public and local governments on the changes of this legislation.

WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL

Individuals with disabilities will face another obstruction in receiving liberties and pursuit of

happiness that all Americans are entitled to.

Failure to enact could possibly encourage individuals with disabilities to shop on-line through

the Internet as opposed to driving to local businesses, therefore reducing gross receipt tax collec-

tion in New Mexico, negatively impacting revenue streams.

PD/yr