Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR Stewart

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

1-23-06

HB 58/a HCPAC

SHORT TITLE

Domestic Violence & Children's Services

SB

ANALYST Lucero

APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)

Appropriation

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY06

FY07

$3,000.0

Recurring

General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Duplicates SB124, Relates to HB213 & SB221 and HB12

Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

Responses Received From

Children, Youth and Family Department (CYFD)

Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

SUMMARY

Synopsis of HCPAC amendment

This Consumer and Public Affairs Committee amendment changes the language in this bill

which limited the expenditure from a statewide coalition provider, to a more generic, statewide

service providers. This opens the opportunity to more vendors. In New Mexico, there are only

two statewide coalitions which provide domestic violence services and the previous language

limited the expenditure to one of the two.

Synopsis of Bill of Original Bill

House Bill 58 appropriates $3,000.0 from the GENERAL FUND for expenditure in 2006 and

2007 to Children, Youth and Families Department for the purpose of contracting with a state-

wide domestic violence coalition to provide needed improvements to shelters and services for

children who are victims of domestic violence.

House Bill 58/aHCPAC – Page

2

House Bill 58 declares an emergency for public peace, health and safety.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

The appropriation of $3,000.0 contained in this bill is a RECURRING expense to the GENERAL

FUND. Any unexpended or unencumbered balances remaining at the end of 2007shall revert to

the GENERAL FUND.

This appropriation was not included in the Department’s Budget Request. The Executive rec-

ommendation includes $3,000.0 for Domestic Violence Services.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

The bill allows for contracting with a statewide coalition to provide needed improvements to

shelters and services for children who are victims of domestic violence. Currently there are only

two statewide providers. This language limits the appropriation to statewide coalitions and more

specifically to provide services for children.

The bill specifies that the appropriation can be used for shelter improvements. Providing a gen-

eral fund appropriation for shelter improvements or capital improvements may violate the anti-

donation statute. Funds which have been used to improve a non-profit or for profit provider fa-

cility may have to return the funds to the general fund if and when the asset is sold. As an alter-

native, a revolving fund can provide low or no interest loans to providers for shelter improve-

ments.

PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS

CYFD contributed the following statement:

“The bill, as written, would positively affect existing CYFD performance outcome measures of

“Percent of adult victims receiving Domestic Violence services who are living in a safer, more

stable environment as measured by the Domestic Violence Assessment Tool” and “Percent of

adult victims receiving Domestic Violence services who show improved client competencies in

social living, coping and thinking skills as measured by the Domestic Violence Assessment

Tool”.”

However, the bill states “to provide needed improvements to shelters and services for children

who are victims of violence; there is no mention of adults services.

CYFD contributed the following statement:

The bill would allow for increased program and service capacity statewide enabling a greater

number of children who are victims of domestic violence to be served.

Administrative Office of the Courts contributed the following statement:

FY 06 is the third year that the courts are participating in performance based budgeting. This bill

may have an impact on the measures of the courts in the following areas:

1.

Cases disposes as a percent of cases filed

2.

Percent change in case filings by case type

3.

Clearance rate

House Bill 58/aHCPAC – Page

3

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

CYFD will absorb the additional administrative services for developing and monitoring the con-

tract.

None to the judiciary

CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP

House Bill 58 duplicates Senate Bill 124

Relates to:

HB213 and SB221 which specifies:

•

$1 million for shelter care and shelter improvements..

•

$1.5 million to provide child adolescent counseling and crisis intervention for victims of

domestic violence and their children

•

$500 thousand to provide training and education in public schools and other community

centers that provide services to families dealing with domestic violence

HB12 is for a Shiprock domestic violence shelter

TECHNICAL ISSUES

Unlike HB213/SB221, this bill does not specify how much of the appropriation can be used for

improvements to shelters and how much for services for children who are victims of domestic

violence.

The contract with an eligible provider should specify and ensure state funds are not used for any

religious, sectarian or denominational purposes, instruction or material.

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

The language in the bill limits the expenditure to a contract with a statewide domestic violence

coalition. Currently, CYFD is issuing RFP’s for its domestic violence programming. This bill,

appropriating to a statewide coalition, may undermine how CYFD is currently operating unless it

intends to provide a separate “pot of money” for statewide coalitions versus the current “pot of

money” for all domestic violence providers.

There are currently only two statewide domestic violence coalitions.

ALTERNATIVES

The bill could focus on prevention or adult victims since HB213/SB221 provides for services for

children.

WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL

Status Quo.

DL/yr:nt

House Bill 58/aHCPAC – Page

4