Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Saavedra
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/21/06
1/23/06 HB 41
SHORT TITLE Severance Tax Permanent Fund Transfer
SB
ANALYST Schardin
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
125,000
Non-Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
FY08
1,175 Recurring General Fund
125,000
Non-Recurring Severance Tax
Permanent Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB47 and SB66.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
State Investment Council (SIC)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 41 would transfer $125 million from the general fund to the severance tax permanent
fund (STPF) at the end of FY06.
pg_0002
House Bill 41 – Page 2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Transferring $125 million from the general fund to the STPF would reduce the FY07 transfer to
general fund reserves by $125 million. The LFC currently projects general fund reserves to total
$1.044 billion at the end of FY06. This amount includes $352.5 million in the general fund oper-
ating reserve, $137.1 million in the appropriation contingency fund, $83.9 million in the tobacco
permanent fund, and $470.3 million in the tax stabilization reserve. Both the LFC and the gover-
nor have adopted a target of keeping general reserves at 10 percent of recurring appropriations,
which equals $471 million in FY06. Transferring $125 million to the STPF would reduce general
fund reserves to a level of $918.8 million, or 19.5 percent of recurring appropriations.
Transferring $125 million from the general fund to the STPF would increase the STPF corpus by
$125 million. The average market value of the STPF at the end of the last five calendar year’s is
the base for 4.7 percent distributions to the general fund, so it will take five years for general
fund distributions from the STPF to fully reflect the injection to the STPF corpus. Increasing the
market value by $125 million during CY2006 would increase STPF distributions by $1.2 million
in FY08, $2.4 million in FY09, $3.8 million in FY10, $5.2 million in FY11, and $6.7 million in
FY12.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Preservation of the STPF corpus depends on contributions to the fund from the severance tax
bonding fund (STBF) and earnings to the fund exceeding distributions from the STPF to the gen-
eral fund that are constitutionally mandated. Although contributions to the STPF exceeded $100
million in CY2000 and CY2001, contributions were only $32 million in CY02 and $1.3 million
in CY03. This decline in contributions to the STPF is due to proliferation of the severance tax
sponge bonds, which are used to prevent transfer of STBF balances to the STPF. By boosting
STPF contributions, House Bill 41 would help ensure preservation of the STPF corpus.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 41 relates to House Bill 47, which would transfer $200 million from the general fund
to the STPF. It also relates to Senate Bill 66, which would transfer $1 billion from the general
fund to the LGPF.
SS/yr