Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Smith
DATE TYPED 10/7/05
HB
SHORT TITLE Tax Rebates for Natural Disaster Victim Aid
SB 6
ANALYST Francis
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
($75,500)
Non-Recurring General Fund
($400)
($100) Non-Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB10, SB1
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 6 partially duplicates House Bill 10 and Senate Bill 1 and adds the option of having
the Tax and Revenue Department (TRD) divert a portion of any personal income tax refund to
the Department of Public Safety (DPS) for distribution to nonprofit organizations that provide
assistance to victims of natural disasters in the United States.
The bill directs TRD to add a designation on the state income tax form for such contributions.
The bill, like HB10, also sets up a rebate on the personal income tax to be mailed out immedi-
ately to all taxpayers by the secretary of the Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD). The in-
pg_0002
Senate Bill 6. -- Page 2
tent of the rebate is to mitigate the recent high costs of gasoline and the expected increases in the
cost of heating this winter. The rebate decreases as income rises and increases as family size in-
creases.
The rebate is paid to any resident who files an individual NM income tax return and is not a de-
pendent of another individual, who was not an inmate of a public institution for more than six
months during tax year 2004 and was a resident on the last day of 2004. Additionally, residents
who do not receive rebates can claim it on their 2005 tax return provided they were not an inmate
of a public institution for more than six months in 2005 and were residents as of the last day of
tax year 2005.
The only divergence from the taxpayer rebate section in this bill as compared to the similar
HB10 is that the latter appropriated $500,000 for administration. This is noted in the “Additional
Impact” cell in the table above.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The cost of the rebates is $75.5 million in direct payments administered by the secretary of the
Taxation and Revenue Department. Though the bill does not state it explicitly the assumption is
that the appropriation for the rebate is out of the general fund. $400 thousand is appropriated for
the administration of the payments to TRD. This is in conflict with HB10 which appropriates
$500 thousand to TRD for the processing of the rebates.
The rebate is designed to provide all taxpayers with some relief. It is weighted towards larger,
low income families. The minimum rebate is $50 while the maximum is $200 and the average is
$89 per return. The rebate is based on adjusted gross income and exemptions declared on the
2004 returns.
The rebate decreases as income goes up and increases as exemptions go up. For one exemption,
like a single tax filer, the maximum is $80 while the minimum is $50 (see table).
Proposed Rebate Schedule
Number of exemptions:
Over: But not over:
1
2
3
4
5
6
$0 $10,000
$80
$125
$155
$175
$190
$200
$10,001 $20,000
$75
$115
$145
$160
$170
$175
$20,001 $35,000
$70
$105
$130
$140
$145
$150
$35,001 $45,000
$65
$95
$115
$125
$130
$135
$45,001 $60,000
$60
$85
$100
$105
$110
$115
$60,001 No Limit
$50
$70
$80
$85
$90
$95
Adjusted Gross Income:
TRD estimates that the bulk of the rebates, almost 50%, will go to taxpayers who have less than
$20,000 in adjusted gross income (see chart).
pg_0003
Senate Bill 6. -- Page 3
Percentage of Total Rebate Benefits
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0 to 10k 10k to 20k 20k to 35k 35k to 45k 45k to 60k 60k+
Assuming 5% of tax payers are able to divert 100% of the amount of the rebate to victims assis-
tance, DPS would have approximately $3.8 million to distribute to nonprofits. In taxable year
2003, the taxpayer “checkoff” for “Share with Wildlife,” a similar concept and the checkoff with
the highest participation, only had 38,964 participants or 4.5% of all tax returns.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The advanced payment provisions of the proposal will require TRD to incur expenses associated
with identifying eligible taxpayers and their appropriate advanced payment amount, and also
with mailing the advanced payments. TRD has estimated that this will cost $500 thousand to
process and distribute the rebates to taxpayers. TRD expects they can complete the job and have
all of the rebates mailed out by December 15
th
, 2005.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
There is a provision in the bill that reduces the exemptions by one for husband and wife who
have filed a joint return where only one individual is a NM resident. It is unclear how they claim
the rebate if the non-resident becomes a resident in the 2005 tax year.
A similar issue arises for taxpayers who increase their exemptions (i.e. have or adopt a child) in
2005 and are theoretically entitled to an additional rebate amount.
Bill refers to “husband and wife who have filed a joint return” rather than “married individuals
filing jointly” as is the convention in the Income Tax Act.
QUESTIONS
Will providing a tax check-off discourage or encourage other charity.
What has been the experience with other tax check-offs.
Have the administrative costs balanced the benefits of other tax check-offs.
NF/lg