Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR McSorley
DATE TYPED 03-08-05 HB
SHORT TITLE NM Colleges Full & Part-Time Faculty Study
SB SJM59
ANALYST Woods
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates HJM73
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
New Mexico Commission on Higher Education (CHE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Joint Memorial 59 – Resolving to Study the Part- and Full-Time Faculty and Staff Ra-
tions at New Mexico Colleges and Universities – notes that:
the Commission on Higher Education has reported that New Mexico universities
and colleges use part-time faculty similarly;
the Commission on Higher Education reported no evidence that part-time fac-
ulty members are any less capable or qualified than full-time faculty members;
part-time faculty members constitute between thirty and seventy percent of New
Mexico post-secondary faculties;
governing boards of New Mexico post-secondary schools have an obligation to
carry out their roles and missions equitably and provide leadership and guid-
ance;
pg_0002
Senate Joint Memorial 59 -- Page 2
courses should be taught by highly qualified faculty, whether part- or full-time,
tenured or non-tenured, who are paid a professional salary and are included in
the academic processes;
studies have shown that the majority of part-time faculty members teach under
substandard conditions; and
national professional organizations representing post-secondary faculty, admin-
istrators and trustees have agreed that fair compensation for part-time and non-
tenure-track faculty should be based on qualifications commensurate with ten-
ure-track faculty qualifications, with a goal of pro rata rather than per-course-
hour rates.
With respect to the above factors, this joint memorial resolves the following:
that the Commission on Higher Education be requested to convene a "best prac-
tices task force" to examine compensation practices and conditions of employ-
ment for part-time faculty at post-secondary schools;
that the task force include both full- and part-time faculty, members of the
Commission on Higher Education, staff of the Legislative Finance Committee,
representatives of the American Federation of Teachers and the Association of
University Professors and members of university, community and technical col-
lege administrations; and
that the best practices task force report be presented to an appropriate interim
legislative committee by September 30, 2005 and that the report address the fol-
lowing issues:
o
establishment of minimum acceptable levels of salaries and bene-
fits for part-time faculty;
o
indexing part-time faculty to full-time tenure-track faculty;
o
means of recognizing professional stature of part-time faculty;
o
fiscal implications of increased reliance on part-time faculty; and
o
means of addressing inequities in compensation for part-time fac-
ulty at post-secondary schools;
that the best practices task force develop a set of best practice principles and recommenda-
tions for use by all post-secondary schools beginning in the 2007 fiscal year; and
that the Commission on Higher Education develop a plan and submit recommendations to
the second session of the Forty-Seventh Legislature to address compensation and staffing
pg_0003
Senate Joint Memorial 59 -- Page 3
issues at post-secondary schools and submit to the governor a ten-year implementation
plan for improved part-time faculty salaries and benefits.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The memorial further resolves that copies of the memorial be transmitted to members of the
Commission on Higher Education and the presidents of each of New Mexico's post-secondary
schools.
While this joint memorial does not address the matter of costs, CHE observes that it could im-
pact the commission in two respects:
The commission would bear the fiscal impact of conducting the requested study, preparing
reports, etc. These non-recurring costs would impact the operating budget of the commis-
sion; and
implementation of a multi-year proposal to improve part-time faculty salaries and benefits
could have very substantial fiscal impacts on the state general fund appropriations to the
institutions. This would occur in the event that the higher education funding formula is re-
vised to provide additional financial resources to the institutions for this purpose.
CHE adds that the commission is charged with the administrative responsibility for the activities
outlined in this joint memorial, and that implementation will require a significant commitment of
staff time and resources, especially in view of the relatively short time frame defined in the bill
for development and presentation of recommendations.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
HJM73 and SJM59 are duplicate measures.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
CHE observes that, historically, compensation practices at the post-secondary institutions have
been matters within the full control of institutional governing boards and administrations. The
CHE has not played a significant role in the development of common compensation practices. It
is also noted that the current higher education funding mechanism generates resources for the
institutions primarily based on estimated costs per student credit hour of instruction. The for-
mula does not directly address issues related to full-time versus part-time faculty compensation.
CHE adds that the higher education funding mechanism currently used in New Mexico provides
a lump sum appropriation to the institutions for “Instruction and General” purposes. Institutions
have broad discretion to allocate the state funding to best address institutional priorities. Institu-
tional practices with respect to faculty compensation and fringe benefits have generally been un-
der the purview of the institutional boards and administrations. Commission involvement in this
area has historically been very limited.
BFW/lg