Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Campos
DATE TYPED 2/08/05
HB
SHORT TITLE Capital Projects Act
SB 9
ANALYST Kehoe
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(See Fiscal Im-
pact Narrative)
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates and relates to House Bill 499.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
General Services Department (GSD)
Department of Indian Affairs (DIA)
New Mexico Public Education Department (PED)
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)
Department of Finance & Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 9 creates the Capital Projects Act; establishes the Capital Projects Council; and pro-
vides procedures for evaluating and prioritizing proposed capital projects.
Significant Issues
Senate Bill 9 creates the Capital Projects Act for the purpose of creating a council of experts to
evaluate and prioritize proposed statewide and local capital outlay projects and to monitor and
oversee projects authorized by the Legislature to ensure appropriations are expended in the most
cost-effective manner.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 9 -- Page 2
The Capital Projects Council would consist of twelve members, seven of whom would be ap-
pointed by the governor. The members appointed by the governor may be cabinet secretaries or
public members and one member must represent Indian nations, tribes and pueblos. Public
members appointed by the governor are required to have expertise in capital financing, planning
or construction. Other members of the council would consist of the state engineer, executive di-
rectors of the Commission of Higher Education, New Mexico Municipal League, New Mexico
Association of Counties, and the New Mexico Finance Authority, or their designees. The Coun-
cil may also appoint such committees and subcommittees as necessary to carry out its duties.
The purpose of the Council is to coordinate all planning, oversight, monitoring and reporting
functions of state government regarding capital projects authorized by law. Capital projects and
capital improvements funded pursuant to the Public School Capital Outlay Act and the Public
School Capital Improvements Act are exempted from the council’s authority and those capital
projects authorized by legislation enacted after July 1, 2006 that specifically exclude capital pro-
jects from the provisions of the Act. The Council would begin to organize, perform its duties
and accept proposals for capital projects and prioritize the proposals after July 1, 2006--the effec-
tive date of the Act; and by December 1, 2006 and each year thereafter, make recommendations
to the Legislature for funding the prioritized projects.
After July 1, 2006, any agency, political subdivision, instrumentality or institution of the state
may submit a proposal for a capital project to the Council. Each proposal would be required to
contain the following: 1) a detailed description; 2) an explanation of need; 3) a description of the
prime beneficiaries; 4) the estimated total cost and an explanation of how the cost was derived;
5) the amount and source of any matching funds; 6) an explanation of how the project will be
implemented and maintained, and the amount and source of estimated maintenance costs; and 7)
any other information required by the rule of the Council. Upon receipt of the proposal, the
Council will conduct site visits and public hearings, as necessary, and then list all proposals in
order of priority. The prioritized projects, methodology, and the Council’s recommendations
will be submitted to the 2004 Legislature for proposed legislation and consideration.
The bill requires all agencies, institutions, instrumentalities, and political subdivision of the state
to assist the council with its duties. In addition, all entities receiving government-funded capital
projects would be required to assist the Council in carrying out the provisions of the Capital Pro-
jects Act. Specific duties of the Council include improving the process used to plan and priori-
tize capital projects and the use of available capital funding; establish criteria for evaluating,
monitoring and overseeing capital project requests and developing reporting requirements to en-
sure cost-effective implementation consistent with funding authorizations.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 9 does not contain an appropriation. However, the bill allows the Council, subject to
appropriation, to appoint and employ the necessary professional, technical and clerical assistance
to support the Council in its duties and further requires the Council to prepare an annual operat-
ing budget for submission to the Legislature. In addition, a provision of the bill allows the public
members of the proposed Council to receive per diem and mileage pursuant to the Per Diem and
Mileage Act. The bill allows the Council to apply for and receive grants, gifts, donations, and
bequests.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 9 -- Page 3
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
To some extent, the proposed duties of the Council duplicate the activities of the newly created
Capital Outlay Unit and Local Government Division of the Department of Finance & Admini-
stration, Property Control Division, New Mexico Finance Authority, Commission on Higher
Education, Aging & Long-Term Care Department, and other agencies with a planning process
for prioritizing capital projects.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 9 relates to and conflicts with House Bill 499. House Bill 499 creates a Capital Out-
lay Division in the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA). The powers and duties of
the proposed division include: 1) preparing, amending and maintaining a four-year program of
major state capital improvement projects to be undertaken by the state with state aid or under
state regulation; 2) maintaining a central database on capital outlay projects that includes fiscal
information on and progress status of the projects; 3) identifying fund balances that should be
reverted and notify the secretary; 4) working with other state agencies to coordinate capital pro-
jects to achieve better accountability and reporting; 5) providing technical assistance to the legis-
lature as they develop joint priorities to be funded through the capital outlay process; 6) working
with state agencies and local and tribal governments in developing capital outlay funding priori-
ties for local and tribal governments; and 7) approving budget adjustment requests related to
capital projects.
The 2004 Legislature appropriated, and the governor approved, a $700.0 thousand special appro-
priation for improving administration of the capital outlay program. A Capital Projects Unit
(CPU), consisting of a director and seven FTE, was established by DFA commencing in May
2004. The LFC funding recommendation for fiscal year 2006 totals $636.6 thousand for con-
tinuation of the Capital Outlay Unit.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The State of New Mexico has allocated over $2 billion in the last ten years for special, state and
local capital improvements statewide. Traditionally, funding for capital outlay is derived from
various sources: severance tax bonds, general obligation bonds, general fund, state road fund and
other state funds (Miner’s Trust Fund, Irrigation Water Construction Fund, Penalty & Interest
Fund, et. al). Capital appropriations have varied from less than $50 million in 1991 to in excess
of $300 million in 2004. Given the disparity between capacity and needs from year to year, pro-
jects should be carefully prioritized and selected based on emergency situations, public health
and safety issues, federal mandates, preservation of the state’s assets, continuation projects re-
quiring additional funding for completion, and projects with other funding sources to maximize
state dollars.
The proposed Council would consolidate capital planning into a comprehensive statewide func-
tion. With so many critical capital needs and limited resources, the proposed Council could pro-
vide valuable insight into priorities, especially on a local level. With a standardized request, re-
view and reporting process, there could be better utilization of scarce capital funds and more ac-
countability for appropriate and timely expenditures. It is a responsible approach to capital plan-
ning, which would be enhanced by encouraging coordination on a local and regional level to sur-
face community priorities and ensure all capital needs are adequately considered.
pg_0004
Senate Bill 9 -- Page 4
The Property Control Division of the General Services Department (GSD) is the major recipient
of capital project appropriations which support new construction and renovation, and repair and
equipment replacement at the state’s almost 850 buildings throughout New Mexico. Projects for
state-owned public facilities compete with other local projects for capital dollars, but coordina-
tion at a local level to surface community priorities is not part of the process. In order to protect
the public’s real estate assets, a more comprehensive approach to recognizing problems and
evaluating priorities is needed.
GSD and DFA currently and jointly administer the four-year plan which requires agencies to
submit by July 1
st
each year their projected capital program for the next four years, and by mid-
September the specifics of requests for the upcoming legislative session. The review and rec-
ommendation process each autumn includes DFA/GSD hearings with agencies and results in the
Governor’s capital budget. It is unclear whether this process would continue or be replaced by
the Capital Projects Council.
The State Board of Finance (BOF) maintains a report by agency reflecting sold, expended and
balances for each project authorized for funding from general obligation and severance tax
bonds. A separate report provides the amount, in aggregate, of unexpended bond proceeds for
each series of bonds. A direct correlation between DFA’s and BOF’s reports is impractical due
to a number of factors. Bond sales are issued in multiple series and may contain partial amounts
sold in separate issues. The DFA monitoring system relies on agency reported data that is not
audited. Also, bond expenditures are made on a reimbursement basis of actual expenditures, but
expenditures reported in the monitoring system may include payments from other funds that
have not been submitted for reimbursement.
The Local Government Division (LGD) serves as a clearinghouse for all state and federal grant
or loan programs for local community infrastructure development. The LGD administers a Local
Infrastructure Capital Improvements Plan (ICIP) to assist local governments in submitting data to
support their requests for appropriations. The plan is not statutorily created and requires “volun-
teer” participation by municipalities, counties, and special districts (Native Americans, water as-
sociations, fire districts and soil and water districts). Only a small percent of all planned priori-
ties listed on the ICIP are funded by direct legislative appropriations.
At the governor’s direction at the end of 2004, CPU developed a list of the top three planned and
supported project priorities of all municipalities, counties, tribal entities, and several water
associations and special districts totaling $1.8 billion. Of the $1.8 billion, $968 million is
needed to match “other funds” totaling $191 million available at the local level for Phase I of the
projects. The list is available through the CPU or LFC offices.
LMK/njw