Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Harrison
DATE TYPED 02/10/05 HB 691
SHORT TITLE Local Empowerment Districts for Alcohol
SB
ANALYST Ford
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
Minimal – See
Narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates SB 244
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
SUMMARY
Attorney General (AGO)
Department of Health (DOH)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
Regulation and Licensing Department (RLD)
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 691 allows local counties and municipalities to create local empowerment districts in
areas suffering from problems associated with chronic public intoxication or illegal activities as-
sociated with alcohol. Jurisdictions may enact restrictions on the sale of alcohol that are stricter
than the restrictions in state law by adopting an ordinance that meets specified requirements. Re-
strictions must be reasonably related to reducing chronic public intoxication or illegal activities
associated with alcohol sales or consumption and may include restrictions on hours of operation,
types of products sold and size of containers.
Before taking effect, the creation of the local empowerment district and the restrictions shall be
approved by the director of Alcohol and Gaming Division of RLD after a public hearing. The
pg_0002
House Bill 691-- Page 2
bill provides for the dissolution of a local empowerment district by the director, either at the re-
quest of the jurisdiction or by the director’s discretion.
Significant Issues
DOH writes that New Mexico is one of the leading states for per capita alcohol consumption and
is also one of the leading states for alcohol related problems, such as accidents, cirrhosis, and
alcohol related deaths. Some areas of the state bear the burden of these problems more heavily
than others. DOH further notes that chronic public intoxication is often associated with in-
creased crime and places additional stress on law enforcement, emergency medical services,
sanitation, and health systems.
DPS writes that restrictions within a local empowerment district may simply push the problems
associated with chronic public intoxication out of the local empowerment district and into nearby
jurisdictions, jeopardizing the safety of the motoring public and the individual traveling outside
the district to obtain prohibited beverages. DPS also notes that the restrictions could create a
black market for banned products.
AGO writes that liquor licensees could challenge the provisions of the bill on grounds that they
violate equal protection by creating different restrictions for people holding the same license.
The AGO also notes that Section 60-7A-15 NMSA 1978 allows the district attorney to bring an
action to abate a public nuisance with regard to illegal sale or consumption of alcoholic bever-
ages.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill will result in costs increases to RLD to hold public hearings on the creation of local em-
powerment districts. The costs will depend on the number of jurisdictions that pass ordinances
creating the local empowerment districts.
The special investigation division of DPS, which is charged with enforcing provisions of the Liq-
uor Control Act, may also incur cost increases to enforce the stronger restrictions created in local
empowerment districts.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 691 duplicates Senate Bill 244
TECHNICAL ISSUES
DPS and RLD note that “illegal activities” is not defined in the bill.
EF/njw