Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Cheney
DATE TYPED 2/9/05
HB 506
SHORT TITLE DWI License Suspensions and Interlocks
SB
ANALYST Medina
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Conflicts with HB 282
Relates to HB 472, HB 492, HB 493, HB 494, HB 502, SB 154, SB 187, SB 390 and SB 391
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)
Attorney General (AG)
Public Defender Department (NMPD)
Department of Transportation (NMDOT)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 506 amends various sections of statute related to ignition interlock and motor vehicle
licenses. The bill requires that a motor vehicle license not be issues to a person convicted of
DWI except as provided in the Ignition Interlock Licensing Act (Sections 66-5-501 through 66-
5-504). The bill makes revocation of a motor vehicle license mandatory upon a driver’s convic-
tion of any offense rendering a persona “first offender” as defined in the Motor Vehicle Code.
The bill further provides that no first or subsequent offender be issued a driver’s license.
House Bill 506 further provides that upon a DWI conviction, the offender’s driver’s license shall
be revoked and have driving privileges denied. The bill provides that within 24 hours of convic-
tion, the sentencing court shall notify MVD of the conviction and upon receipt of this notifica-
tion, MVD is to revoke or deny the offender’s driver’s license and driving privileges.
pg_0002
House Bill 506 -- Page 2
Significant Issues
This bill requires that any person convicted of DWI is to be denied a driver’s license unless that
person applies for an ignition interlock license. The bill does not provide for due process in
driver’s license revocation. According to NMPD, the action is mandatory and automatic and due
process requires notice and an opportunity for a hearing before the state can suspend or revoke a
person’s driver’s license [State v. Herrera, 111 N.M. 560, 562, 807 P.2d 744, 746 (Ct. App.
1991); Maso v. State Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 2004-NMSC-28, ¶10 (N.M., 2004)]. NMPD
also contends that this bill will not withstand constitutional challenges.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to AOC, there will be a minimal administrative cost for statewide update, distribution,
and documentation of statutory changes. Any additional fiscal impact on the judiciary would be
proportional to the enforcement of this law and commenced prosecutions. New laws, amend-
ments to existing laws, and new hearings have the potential to increase caseloads in the courts,
thus requiring additional resources to handle the increase.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
This bill conflict directly with HB 282, which adds additional mandatory ignition interlock re-
quirements. This bill is also most similar to HB 502.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
Current law regarding driver’s license issuance and denial for those convicted of DWI will re-
main the same.
DXM/yr