Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Garcia
DATE TYPED 3-08-2005 HB
SHORT TITLE Lower Historic Property Tax Value
SB SJR 19
ANALYST Taylor
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
(Uncertain) Recurring Local Governments
(Uncertain) Recurring State G.O. Bonds
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis of the Resolution
Senate Joint Resolution 19 proposes an amendment to the New Mexico Constitution authorizing
the legislature to provide a lower value percentage of value against which property tax rates are
assessed for historic property worthy of preservation. The legislature would be provided the le-
gal authority to define such property. The percentage of value against which property tax rates
are assessed would have to be at least twenty-two and nine-tenths percent.
The proposed amendment would be submitted to the people for approval or rejection at the next
general election or a special election prior to then called for that purpose.
Significant Issues
The constitution currently requires that the percentage of value against which property tax rates
are assessed is thirty-three and one-third percent. The proposed minimum rate for properties
deemed worthy of preservation is twenty-two and two tenths percent. This implies a one-third
reduction in property taxes for these properties.
pg_0002
Senate Joint Resolution 19-- Page 2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The fiscal implications of the resolution are uncertain because it is not known whether the voters
would approve the constitutional amendment. It is also unknown how many properties the legis-
lature would deem worthy of preservation status. However, should the amendment receive voter
approval, there would be a negative fiscal impact to local government property tax revenues.
Also, there would be a loss in general obligation bond capacity. These are likely to be small,
however.
BT/lg