Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Martinez
DATE TYPED 2/28/2005 HB
SHORT TITLE Temporary Disability Benefits Act
SB 1070
ANALYST Dunbar
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
$145.0
See Narrative Non-Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVANUE
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
Subsequent
Years Impact
$145.0
Non-Recurring State
Temporary
Disabilities
Fund
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Labor (DOL)
Human Services Department (HSD)
NM Public Education Department (NMPED)
Workers’ Compensation Administration (WCA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 1070 creates a new act that provides for temporary disability for non-work-related
illness or injury through a state temporary disability fund or private employer plans. The private
disability insurance plans can be entered into by employers or unions to compensate privately
employed individuals, unless the State elects to participate. The bill also creates The State Tem-
pg_0002
Senate Bill 1070 Page 2
porary Disability Benefits Fund and provides for penalties regarding the increasing or decreasing
of temporary disability benefits.
Significant Issues
The Act requires the formation on a new division for the Department of Labor, which is tasked
with the Act’s administration.
A new advisory council on temporary disability benefits will be formed and will be comprised of
eleven members, all but one to be appointed by the Governor. The council will be paid per-diem
and mileage as provided in the Per-Diem and Mileage Act.
The maximum total temporary disability benefits payable to a covered individual for a period of
disability shall be either 26 times the covered individual’s weekly temporary disability benefit
amount or one-third of the covered individual’s total wages in the base year, whichever is less.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
DOL projects the following cost to contract for implementing the system:
1.
Estimated IT Cost for the automation portion of the disability temporary benefits pro-
gram.
Hardware Cost:
PC - $12, 000 per computer
Printer Cost -
Office document printer - $3,000 per printer * 2 = $6,000
Check printer - $5,000 per printer * 2 = $10,000
Development Cost –
Senior programmer analyst - $105.00 hr * 460 hr = $48,300.00
Junior programmer analyst - $95.00 hr * 460 hr = $43,700
Computer engineer - $105.00 hr * 240 hr = $25,200
Recurring Cost –
Maintenance –
Junior programmer analyst - $95.00 hr * 80 hr = $7,600
Computer engineer - $105.00 hr * 40 hr = $4,200
Estimated Cost of automation = $145,000.00 (this estimate does not include the cost of
PC’s)
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Pursuant to this Act, the Department of Labor will be tasked with the following:
1.
Provide notice to all recipients of disability benefits explaining conditions for receiving
unemployment compensation.
2.
Review and approve private insurance plans
3.
Process and monitor payments of Temp. Disability benefits to eligible persons whether
from private plans or the disability fund.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 1070 Page 3
4.
Conduct investigations and hold adjudicatory hearings with hearing officers in the event
there is disagreement between the employer and the injured employee regarding eligibil-
ity for temporary disability.
5.
Pay for the cost of recording, transcribing and preparation of record.
6.
Pay for intermittent medical examination by a provider chosen by the department.
These requirements will require the Department to establish an entirely new Division to adminis-
ter and adjudicate these benefits. Additional FTEs and space with adequate technological support
will also be needed. Without further information, it is difficult for the department to determine
the entire cost of establishing a new Division with new duties. The department is unable to pro-
ject how many FTE will be required to implement this new law or the level of FTE necessary to
comply with the law (e.g. attorney vs clerk)
The Bill requires that the labor department approve private plans for disability benefits. NM
General Service Department Risk Management or the Insurance Commissioner is better situated
to conduct this survey. NMDOL employees are not familiar with state insurance laws, which is a
specialized legal area.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Section 2: DEFINITIONS state in part …“covered employer” means an individual or or-
ganization, who is an employer, except the state, its political subdivisions or an instrumental-
ity of the state, unless the governmental entity elects to become a covered employer. There-
fore, this bill appears to provide the state the option of whether to become a “covered em-
ployer” or not.
This bill does not describe in detail how the state temporary disability benefits fund will be
funded by the “covered employer” and the “covered individual.” Therefore, the budget im-
pact for state departments cannot be determined cannot be determined at this time.
Subsection C of Section 17 defines a minor under the age of 21. NMSA 1978, Section 28-6-1
provides that … “Except as … otherwise specifically provided by existing law, any person who
has reached his eighteenth birthday shall be considered to have reached his majority as provided
in Section 12-2-2 NMSA 1978 [repealed] and is an adult for all purposes the same as if he had
reached his twenty-first birthday.”
The bill provides, in Section 13, for various grounds for the denial of benefits. However, the bill,
according to WCA, does not provide any mechanism for the Fund or the employer to contest a
claim for benefits (except against a private plan) in the event that one or both believe the claim-
ing individual is not eligible. This may result in an inability to control fraudulent claims
WCA points out that the phrase “except for benefits for permanent partial or permanent total dis-
ability previously incurred” is not explained, and the scope of the intended exclusion is not clear.
If this is intended to refer to cases where the workers’ eligibility for workers compensation bene-
fits has been exhausted, then this language might be construed as a de facto increase in workers’
compensation benefits.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
pg_0004
Senate Bill 1070 Page 4
Currently, eligible state employees have a non-occupational disability plan that they can use. In
addition, a PERA-vested (five or more years of service credit) member is eligible for a non-duty
disability benefit as provided by the provisions of PERA.
Hearing Officer’s final order on a complaint is binding on all the parties and not subject to ap-
peal within the department but may “secure judicial review.” The Court in which the judicial
review might occur is not identified.
If employee prevails in complaint and gets award of benefits, the hearing officer may award at-
torney fees not to exceed 20% of the amount of award to be paid by the insurer or employer.
Appearance fees for medical witnesses may be assessed against individual employer or insurer.
Information gathered for the purpose of a hearing is not subject to public inspection and is confi-
dential.
ANA/sec