Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR McSorley
DATE TYPED 03/04/05 HB
SHORT TITLE Butterflies in Wildlife Conservation Act
SB 850
ANALYST Ford
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
Minimal –
See Narrative
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Game and Fish Department
State Land Office
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 850 adds butterflies to the definition of “wildlife” for purposes of the Wildlife Con-
servation Act (WCA). This has the effect of allowing butterflies to be listed under the Act if
their prospects for survival or recruitment in the state were in jeopardy.
Significant Issues
According to the Department of Game and Fish, butterflies and other insects receive no current
protection under the WCA. The department has biologists on staff whose primary duties are to
implement the WCA for each major taxonomic group but does not have the expertise on staff
relative to butterflies. The department would likely require additional staff to effectively imple-
ment the proposed change.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 850 -- Page 2
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
The Department of Game and Fish has performance measures related to the number of species
listed as threatened or endangered that are monitored, studied and involved in the recovery plan
process. Adding butterflies to the Act could increase the number of species listed. The depart-
ment indicates that without additional staff, the resources of existing staff would have to be di-
verted to become familiar with the biological and ecological matters specific to butterflies. This
could detract from meeting performance measures related to other species.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill may result in cost increases to the Department of Fish and Game, which currently lacks
the expertise to effectively monitor butterflies. The department indicates that it would most
likely require one additional FTE and thus, the cost increase would likely be minimal (under
$100 thousand).
EF/lg