Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Snyder
DATE TYPED 02/25/05 HB
SHORT TITLE Architectural & Engineering Gross
SB 732
ANALYST Padilla-Jackson
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
(*) ($2,200.0)
Similar Recurring
General Fund
(*) ($1,500.0)
Similar Recurring Local Governments
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
(*) uncertain due to the missing effective date.
Duplicate of House Bill 593
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Transportation (DOT)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 732 expands current tax statutes to would allow a gross receipts tax deduction for re-
ceipts from an architectural or an engineering service for sales made to a person in the construc-
tion business. The buyer must have the construction services performed on a construction pro-
ject that is subject to gross receipts tax or located on Indian lands.
No effective date was provided.
Significant Issues
DOT provided the following background:
pg_0002
Senate Bill 732-- Page 2
Currently, Section 7-9-52, NMSA 1978, allows a subcontractor to deduct receipts from the sale
of “construction services” to a prime contractor if these services are sold and used in a construc-
tion project. However, TRD regulations exclude indirect services from this deduction, such as
accounting, architectural, engineering, and drafting. In theory, these services are consumed by
the prime contractor in the performance of the contract, and are considered normal expenses of
doing business. Therefore, although the prime contractor pays gross receipts tax on the whole
amount in the end, the law allows some pyramiding of taxes. Senate Bill 732 will simply extend
the deduction allowed under Sec. 7-9-52 to include engineering and architectural services.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The total fiscal impact of such a bill, as estimated by TRD, is -$3,700.0 in FY06, of which -
$2,200.0 will impact the general fund and -$1,500.0 will impact local governments. Based on a
taxable sales of architectural and engineering services to persons in the construction business es-
timate of $57 million in FY06, TRD calculated the total impact using an average gross receipts
tax rate of 6.5 percent. TRD’s analysis was based on information from the Department’s
“Analysis of Gross Receipts Tax by Industry Classification,” 1997 Economic Census for the
State of New Mexico, and input-output estimates from Implan, Inc.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
None to TRD.
Although DOT is arguably the single largest consumer of engineering and architectural services
in New Mexico, DOT notes that the bill does not affect the department directly.
OPJ/lg