Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR SCORC
DATE TYPED 3-09-2007 HB
SHORT TITLE Tax Rate for Severing Copper
SB 728/SCORC
ANALYST Taylor
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
NFI
Uncertain Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Taxation and Revenue Department
SUMMARY
The Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee (SCORC) substitute for SB 728 amends
the resource excise tax and the processors tax by creating a two-tier tax rate for copper:
1.
when the monthly average price for copper on the commodity exchange of the New York
mercantile exchange is below $1.00 per pound, the tax rate would be one-fourth of one
percent; and
2.
when the monthly average price for copper is above $1.00, the tax rate would be three-
quarters of one-percent.
Under current law, the resource excise tax rate for copper will be three-fourths of one percent as
of July 1, 2005. The current rate is 0.25 percent.
The carries an effective date of July 1, 2005
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with this bill. The price of copper is well above
$1.00 per pound. The futures market as of today (2-28-2005) has copper trading at above $1.25
through February 2007.
Commodity prices are very volatile, however. If copper prices were to fall below $1.00, resource
excise tax revenue would decrease.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 728/SCORC -- Page 2
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD submitted the following discussion of the bill‘s administrative implications:
The proposal would impose significant administrative and compliance challenges. The proposal
would make the resources excise tax rate on copper conditional on the on the price quoted on the
New York mercantile exchange. This price fluctuates daily. The bill does not specifically iden-
tify if the price is first of the month, the last day of the month or an average of the month (includ-
ing or excluding days for which the NYMEX is closed) for which NYMEX identifies a price.
The bill also does not specify requirements for how the Taxation and Revenue Department is to
post on a website or to communicate to taxpayers what the price of copper is and the applicable
tax rate under this proposal.
As an alternative that would be easier to administer, the Secretary could determine the excise
rate, and the tax rate would be locked in for some period, rather than fluctuating. One option
would be to require the Secretary to use an average of the NYMEX spot price over some period
of time, for example, for the previous six months. If the average price so determined is under $1/
lb the tax rate for the following six months would be ¼ of 1 percent, if the price is over $1/lb the
tax rate would be ¾ of 1 percent. The rate would be determined be made available through the
department’s web site by July 10 and January 10 of each year.
BT/lg