Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Kernan
DATE TYPED 02/19/05 HB
SHORT TITLE
ENMU HOBBS GRADUATE EDUCATION
CENTER
SB 725
ANALYST Williams
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
$85.0
Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB 610 and HB 405 to elevate the Eastern New Mexico University off-campus in-
struction program in Ruidoso to branch campus status
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Commission on Higher Education (CHE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 725 appropriates $85 thousand from the general fund to the board of regents of East-
ern New Mexico University (ENMU) for operational costs of the Hobbs center for graduate edu-
cation.
Significant Issues
CHE notes the program offered at this location is for teachers. Funding would hire 1.75 FTE.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $85 thousand contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general
fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY06 would revert to
the general fund.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 725 -- Page 2
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
CHE notes this request was not included in the priority projects for ENMU through the commis-
sion’s funding request cycle.
New degree programs offered by the state’s public post-secondary institutions are typically
funded through the higher education funding formula. Activities to be funded in this proposal
are operational costs for the implementation of a new degree program and will generate revenue
from the instruction and general (I&G) higher education funding formula within the General Ap-
propriation Act when students begin enrolling in the program.
ALTERNATIVES
The legislature may wish to consider the following amendment:
As student credit hours are generated for the proposed degree program, the program will begin to
generate funding through the higher education instruction and general funding formula. The start
up funding of the program should be reduced by the same amount of funding generated by the
higher education instruction and general funding formula.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
Is the program consistent with the institution’s strategic plan and mission.
2.
How many students are enrolled in the program.
3.
Why is formula funding, tuition and other revenues insufficient to address program costs.
4.
Are persistence and graduation rates for students enrolled in the program available.
5.
What are the potential career implications for students completing the program.
AW/njw