Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Jennings
DATE TYPED 03/09/05 HB
SHORT TITLE Tax Credit Definition of Produced Water
SB 706
ANALYST Padilla-Jackson
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
Insignificant Insignificant
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Environment, Minerals & Natural Resources (EMNRD)
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
The Office of the State Engineer (OSE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 706 makes a minor technical correction to existing statutes related to the provision of
tax credits for produced water. The bill adds one word to the definition of “produced water”,
which does not change the meaning, but merely corrects the grammar of the definition. Cur-
rently, there is an allowed tax credit (either for income tax or corporate income tax) equal to
$1,000 per acre-foot of produced water not to exceed four hundred thousand dollars if certain
conditions are met. The bill defines “produced water” to mean water produced from oil or gas
drilling and production from a depth of two thousand five hundred feet or more below the sur-
face or from refining crude oil or processing natural gas, adding the word “from” in front of the
word “refining” in the last sentence.
The bill would also extend the date of a delayed repeal from January 1, 2006 to January 1, 2009.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 706 -- Page 2
Significant Issues
The OSE has indicated that, in its opinion, amending the existing statute to insert the word
“from” at page 2, line 25, and page 4, line 13, would allow the statute to be interpreted to allow
water diverted and used pursuant to a State Engineer permit to qualify for the tax credit. Under
the existing statute, the OSE contends that water diverted pursuant to a State Engineer permit
cannot qualify for the credit. Unlike the TRD, the OSE is of the opinion that without the
amendment, the definition only includes water extracted from the ground and then separated
from the hydrocarbons during refining or processing. OSE cautions that adding the term "from"
could potentially create an ambiguity with respect to whether "makeup water" would be eligible
for the credit. Makeup water is water used in the subsequent refining or processing that origi-
nates from another source, typically a water well licensed or permitted by the State Engineer for
beneficial use.
If this amendment did indeed expand eligibility, as described above, it could potentially increase
the tax credits claimed. TRD, believes that if this were the case, the tax credits may go up mar-
ginally, but did not provide a specific fiscal estimate for this scenario.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
NMED notes that produced water is high in total dissolved solids and often contains other con-
taminants that could be detrimental to the state’s aquatic ecosystems. They note that delivery of
produced water to perennial rivers in New Mexico requires a federal Clean Water Act NPDES
permit which includes New Mexico Environment Department certification that the discharge will
not cause impairment to the state’s water quality.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD has reportedly approved a total of $300.00 in claims for the credits since the credits were
allowed by statute in 2002. According to TRD, extending the delayed repeal provisions as pro-
posed would also be expected to produce insignificant fiscal impacts.
OPJ/yr:rs