Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Ingle
DATE TYPED 2/16/05
HB
SHORT TITLE Special Hospital District Agreements
SB 541
ANALYST Hanika-Ortiz
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
See Narrative
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
Human Services Department (HSD)
General Services Department (GSD)
Aging and Long-Term Services Department (ALTSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 541 adds a new provision to Section 4-48A-9 NMSA 1978 allowing a Special Hospi-
tal District to enter into an agreement with any state or federal agency, county, municipality, or
other political subdivision or person to own or operate a Common Health Care Service. Any
agreement entered into will be subject to the provisions of the Procurement Code under the Act.
Significant Issues
A Special Hospital District is a legal entity governed by an elected Board and coordinates and
provides hospital, physician, laboratory, home health and nursing home services, etc. to a spe-
cific region and population.
Examples of Common Health Care Services are:
*Prescriptions *Doctor Visits *Dental services *Laboratory tests
*Private duty nursing *Speech/language therapy *Physical therapy *Occupational therapy
pg_0002
Senate Bill 541-- Page 2
*Hearing services *X-rays *Podiatry services
*Psychological/mental health services
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
The DOH believes the uncertainty regarding application of the Procurement Code to legal
entities jointly formed under the proposed amendment raises administrative and procurement
issues.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The creating of partnerships as proposed in the amendment may be evidence of a more aggres-
sive marketing strategy in an effort to preserve a Special Hospital District’s market share. If this
is so, then there is the potential for conflict of interest issues that may restrict a consumer’s free-
dom of choice when health care referrals are indicated.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
None
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The DOH seeks a definition as to what a “Common Health Care Service” is under the Act, as the
proposed amendment may be outside the intended scope and purpose of the Special Hospital
District Act.
The DOH further questions to what extent, if any, a state entity and Special Hospital District
would be subject to the Procurement Code.
ALTERNATIVES
The Special Hospital District Act, Section 4-48A-9 NMSA 1978, would remain unchanged.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
A special hospital district would not have the ability to partner with a governmental entity or in-
dividual to own or operate a common health care service.
AHO/yr