Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Rodriguez
DATE TYPED 3-9-05
HB
SHORT TITLE Require Public Toilet Hand Washing Facilities
SB 538/aSPAC/aSFC
ANALYST Collard
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
See Narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Office of the Attorney General (AG)
Department of Health (DOH)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFC Amendment
The Senate Finance Committee amendment to Senate Bill 538 strikes all Senate Public Affairs
Committee amendments, restoring the bill to its original form.
Synopsis of SPAC Amendment
The Senate Public Affairs Committee amendment to Senate Bill 538 allows the provision of an
adequate supply of anti-bacterial sanitizing gel or sanitizing wipes near portable toilets in lieu of
the hand washing facilities required by the original bill.
Significant Issues
The AG’s Office notes the original bill required portable hand washing facilities be provided in
public locations “where portable toilets are required by law or ordinance”. This amendment
would allow the use of sanitizing gel or wipes instead of hand washing facilities. However, nei-
ther the amendment nor the original bill states who is responsible for providing those facilities,
gel or wipes.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 538/aSPAC/aSFC -- Page 2
DOH notes, by adding the provision of an adequate supply of anti-bacterial sanitizing gel or
similarly treated sanitizing wipes, the amended bill would allow an effective, more convenient,
less waste producing and potentially less expensive alternative to plumbed or hauled water, soap
and single-use towels to be used in the setting of public locations with portable toilets.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
HPC points out there is no effective date for this legislation. Additionally, HPC recommends
defining “in close proximity.” How far can the hand-washing facilities be located from the port-
able toilets.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 538 requires hand washing facilities be provided in public locations with portable
toilets. Portable hand washing facilities with single-use towels and potable water would be re-
quired with at least one hand wash facility to every one-to-ten portable toilets in public locations
where portable toilets are required by law or ordinance.
Significant Issues
DOH indicates for generations, hand washing with soap and water has been considered a meas-
ure of personal hygiene. Having hand-washing facilities near portable toilets is a public health
intervention to prevent the transmission of organisms and infection.
The AG’s Office notes he bill is silent as to who is responsible for providing the hand washing
facilities, although presumably it is the same persons or entities authorizing or installing the
portable toilets. This probably should be clarified. The bill does not define “public locations”.
The bill implies that no portable hand washing facilities are required unless the portable toilets
are “required by law or ordinance” at a specific location. The bill does not require hand washing
facilities if required by “rule or regulation”. The law does not provide any penalties for non-
compliance.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no appropriation attached to this bill and it is unclear how much hand-washing facilities
would cost and who would be responsible for the cost.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
DOH research indicates as early as 1843, Oliver Wendell Holmes concluded that some forms of
fever were spread by the hands of health personnel. Normal human skin is colonized with bacte-
ria. Washing hands often with soap and water is recommended to prevent the transmission of the
flu. Having hand-washing facilities near potable toilets is a public health intervention. The fa-
cilities have to be used properly. The availability of hand-washing facilities would eliminate one
possible barrier to adequate hand washing to prevent transmission of infectious disease.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 538/aSPAC/aSFC -- Page 3
ALTERNATIVES
DOH suggests the bill could allow for substituting alcohol based hand “sanitizing” gels for pota-
ble water and single use towels.
DOH notes recent findings in the use of alcohol based hand “sanitizing” gels show that they may
provide a cost effective, less cumbersome way to cleanse hands in and around portable toilets.
One study described the gels as having “high anti-microbial efficacy and ease of use” and found
a 30.4 percent decrease in infection rates in the extended care facility where caregivers used the
gels for a 34 month period.
In the elementary school setting, use of alcohol hand sanitizing gels resulted in an overall reduc-
tion in absenteeism due to infection. Research from Children's Hospital Boston's Division of In-
fectious Diseases showed that using alcohol-based hand sanitizer gel significantly reduces the
spread of gastrointestinal illnesses. When presenting the study at a national conference, the re-
searcher was quoted, “Using hand sanitizer can be an alternative to soap and water when a sink
isn't convenient.”
The AG’s Office suggests the bill could define “public locations” and require portable hand
washing facilities at all such locations where portable toilets are placed, regardless of whether
those toilets are required at those locations by law or ordinance. The bill could also require the
toilet provider to furnish the hand washing facilities, and provide penalties for failure to do so.
KBC/sb:yr:lg