Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR SCC
DATE TYPED 2/22/05
HB
SHORT TITLE State Parks Funding
SB 531/SCONCS
ANALYST Hanika-Ortiz
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
See Narrative
General Fund
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 531/SCCS extends the 2004 nonrecurring capital costs appropriation received by
EMNRD for state park expenditures into FY 05 and subsequent fiscal years. Any unexpended or
unencumbered balances remaining at the end of a fiscal year shall not revert to the general fund
but will remain in the state parks operating fund.
Significant Issues
The appropriation to the EMNRD in 2004 was for land acquisition, planning, construction and
operational costs at Mesilla Valley Bosque State Park.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The LCS redrafted the original bill to clarify the intended purpose of the legislation which is to
simply reauthorize and extend the time for expenditure of an existing and prior appropriation be-
yond FY04.
EMNRD notes the reauthorization and extension of time for expenditure of the prior existing ap-
propriation might be accomplished in the General Appropriations Act which is part of the Execu-
pg_0002
Senate Bill 53l/SCONCS-- Page 2
tive FY06 request.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
HB 640, State Parks Funding
SB 578, State Parks Funding
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The original bill mistakenly created a new appropriation when the original intent was to extend
the time for expenditure of an appropriation received in 2004 to subsequent years. The substitute
bill was drafted to address and correct the problem.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
Because the authorization is part of the Executive’s 2006 request, there should be no conse-
quence.
AHO/yr:lg