Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR McSorley
DATE TYPED 1/31/2005 HB
SHORT TITLE Family Leave Act
SB 449
ANALYST Moser
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
State Personnel Office (SPO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 449, Family Leave Act requires an employer to grant paid or unpaid family leave to
an employee to care for family members as defined in the law. It also prohibits discharge or re-
taliation against employees who exercise the rights defined in this law.
Significant Issues
This law expands coverage provided under the federal Family Leave Act of 1993 by providing
additional employee’s rights at the state level. The law covers all employers in New Mexico re-
gardless of size in addition to including parent-in-laws as a covered family member.
Under the federal law employees must have worked for the employer for at least 1250 hours in
the prior twelve months to be covered. SB 449 provides no minimum time limit that an employee
must have worked for the employer in order to qualify. An employee could potentially work for
one day and then request this leave, whereas leaving the employer in an unfavorable employment
obligation with an employee.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 449 -- Page 2
There is no maximum amount of time stated that an employee can be out, whereas leaving the
employer in an unfavorable employment obligation with an employee. However, this bill ad-
dresses only the utilization of sick leave or other paid leave and does not authorize the utilization
of unpaid leave time such as leave without pay. These leaves would be governed by the em-
ployer’s polices or a collective bargaining agreement.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
This bill could have a significant impact upon small employers with limited staffing.
ALTERNATIVES
The State Personnel Office recommends the following changes:
Add language requiring some minimum amount of time of employment such as 30 or 90 days at
a minimum.
Add language to address a maximum amount of time that the employee can take off such as one
year.
Add language to address “un-paid” leave to be substituted for paid leave in case no leave is of-
fered or the paid leave runs out and the employee still needs care for a qualified family member.
EM/lg:yr