Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR SPAC
DATE TYPED 2/21/05
HB
SHORT TITLE Health Facility & Care Provider Insurance
SB 427/SPACS
ANALYST Wilson
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
See Narrative
Relates to SB 292 & SB 427
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
Human Services Department (HSD)
Public Regulation Commission (PRC)
Public School Insurance Authority (PSIA)
Retiree Health Care Authority (RHCA)
No Response from
General Services Department (GSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The Senate Public Affairs Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 427 amends the Risk Manage-
ment Act, Chapter 15, Article 7, NMSA (1978) by adding a new section permitting a health care
provider to voluntarily purchase risk insurance coverage presently offered to state agencies. A
separate account must be set up for each participating provider.
The provisions in this bill apply to the following health care providers: a licensed physician, hos-
pital, outpatient health care facility, nursing home, intermediate care facility, post-acute health
care facility, osteopathic physician, chiropractic physician, podiatrist, nurse anesthetist, physician
assistant, dentist, psychologist, doctor of oriental medicine, certified nurse practitioner, regis-
tered lay midwife or certified nurse-midwife.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 427/SPACS -- Page 2
The bill provides for the health care provider to be treated like a state agency for purposes of de-
termining its contributions based upon assessment of risk, and for purposes of handling such
contributions. The Secretary of the DOH will need to deem such coverage necessary for the
provider for the public health, as a prerequisite to inclusion in the proposed program.
Significant Issues
The mission of the RMD is to provide risk management and insurance-related services to the
various agencies of state government. This bill will in essence widen that mission to include
providing insurance to certain non-governmental persons and entities that have difficulty finding
liability insurance in the voluntary marketplace. It is worth noting that the door to allowing non-
government entities to enjoy access to insurance coverages procured by the RMD has already
been opened by Subsection B of §15-7-3 which requires the RMD to provide liability coverage
to certain nonprofit corporations under certain circumstances.
The mission of the RMD is to provide risk management and insurance-related services to the
various agencies of state government. This bill will in essence widen that mission to include
providing insurance to certain non-governmental persons and entities that have difficulty finding
liability insurance in the voluntary marketplace. It is worth noting that the door to allowing non-
government entities to enjoy access to insurance coverages procured by the RMD has already
been opened by Subsection B of §15-7-3 which requires the RMD to provide liability coverage
to certain nonprofit corporations under certain circumstances.
This bill attempts to remedy restrictions in the availability of medical malpractice coverage to
New Mexico health care providers by using the Risk Management Division (RMD) of GSD as
an alternative source of professional liability coverage other than the Medical Malpractice Act.
The Medical Malpractice Act provides tort limitations and access to the New Mexico Patients
Compensation Fund to physicians and certain other health care providers if these providers suc-
ceed in obtaining underlying coverage from an authorized insurance company as well as pay the
required surcharges to the Patients Compensation Fund. The Medical Malpractice Act excludes
nurses, midwives, dentists and psychologists and also requires that the underlying insurance cov-
erage be provided on a somewhat obsolete type of policy form.
Obtaining affordable malpractice insurance is a problem for many groups of practitioners.
Medicaid, through its fee-for-service program and its managed care contracts, requires malprac-
tice insurance for its providers
The providers with whom DOH contracts to provide health care services, especially individuals
or small entities, have difficulty in meeting requirements for carrying insurance. This bill will
permit these providers to carry health insurance through the state's risk management functions.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
RMD will need to do an actuarial study to determine premiums for health care providers. The
premiums to be charged should reflect RMD’s cost of administering the program.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 427/SPACS -- Page 3
RMD should avoid any cross-subsidization of new insureds by existing insureds including state
employees. HSD notes any discounted premiums offered to health care providers may be consid-
ered a violation of the anti-donation clause.
The provisions of this his bill should be revenue neutral.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
RMD should be able to recover administrative costs through premiums.
RELATIONSHIP
This bill relates to SB 292 and SB 427 which provides similar coverages, but only to midwives.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The HPC provided the following:
In 1975, Travelers Insurance Company, New Mexico’s liability carrier, announced that it
would no longer provide medical malpractice insurance to the state’s physicians citing
the lack of tort reform and the small book of business available in the state. The state al-
most became the insurer of last resort to avoid a crisis in access to physician services if
there was no entity underwriting liability insurance.
This bill appears to allow the state to become another insurer and places health care pro-
viders in the enviable position of having another insurer of last resort option with the
state being that procurement vehicle to procure vision, dental, any group or individual
health, life, accidental death, dismemberment or disability insurance. The bill positions
the state and providers favorably in the event that insurance is unavailable or too expen-
sive to obtain.
Whether or not having this option available to providers’ influences the private insurance
market’s rating approaches and any segmenting of health care providers is not known.
The state’s intervention back in 1975 and 1976 did moderate the malpractice rate in-
creases and allowed for the creation of a new mutual company to underwrite physician
professional liability risk. New Mexico’s experience under that approach has been posi-
tive. While physician liability rates in other states have soared - in some places to 500%,
New Mexico’s average rate increase last year was less than 10%.
DW/njw:lg