Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Carraro
DATE TYPED 1/31/05
HB
SHORT TITLE Use of Prior DWI Convictions at Sentencing
SB 388
ANALYST Peery
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Bernalillo County Metro Court (BCMC)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
New Mexico Corrections Department (NMCD)
Public Defender Department (PDD)
Administrative Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)
New Mexico Sentencing Commission (NMSC)
No Responses
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 388 adds felony offenses of driving while intoxicated to the definition of “prior fel-
ony conviction” for purposes of the habitual offender sentencing act, NMSA 1978, section 31-
18-17.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
PDD states if a felony DWI conviction was to be used to enhance a non-DWI felony conviction,
the proceedings would be subject to additional challenges. PDD reports this would increase the
difficulty of habitual proceedings for the Department’s felony trial attorneys.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 388 -- Page 2
NMCD states the proposed legislation could negatively impact the performance of the Depart-
ment prison programs if it causes a substantial increase in the number of incarcerated persons.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
PDD states the use of prior felony DWIs to enhance any other subsequent felony conviction will
increase the number of cases that go to trial.
NMCD reports the proposed legislation will probably cause minimal to moderate cost increases
for the Department if it causes an increase in the number of persons placed in prison.
NMSC states the proposed legislation would result in longer prison terms for repeat DWI of-
fenders. Additional years added to current DWI sentences will translate to a significant need for
prison beds in the immediate future and even more over time.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
NMCD states current levels of prison staff may have to work with and provide services for an
increasing number of inmates if the proposed legislation is enacted.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
PDD reports in State v. Begay, 2001 NMSC 2, 130 N.M. 61, the Supreme Court considered
whether pursuant to the Habitual Offender Act, a prior felony conviction of DWI may be used to
increase any subsequent felony. The Court held that in the absence of clear evidence that the
legislature intended to authorize that result, felony DWIs could not be used for enhancement
purposes. The proposed legislation clarifies the Legislatures’ intent to authorize the use of prior
felony DWI convictions for habitual offender purposes.
PDD states the proposed legislation if enacted would be challenged as a violation of a person’s
right to be free of double jeopardy and right to assistance of counsel.
NMSC reports the proposed legislation would create a scenario where mandatory minimums for
felony DWI convictions would be set forth in two separate sections of law. NMSC states if the
proposed legislation is to make DWI convictions subject to the provisions of the Habitual Of-
fender statute, the bill would require an amendment to remove the escalating sanctions and man-
datory minimums for felony DWI convictions from NMSA 1978, Sections 66-8-102.
RLP/yr