Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Smith
DATE TYPED 01/26/05 HB
SHORT TITLE Tax & Revenue Employee Info Disclosure
SB 199
ANALYST Wilson
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
See Narrative
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
No Response From
Taxation & Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 199 amends a section of the Motor Vehicle Code (66-2-7.1) to prohibit TRD employ-
ees or former employees from disclosing to persons other than fellow TRD employees “trade se-
crets”, “customer information”, “proprietary information” or “commercial or financial informa-
tion” acquired by TRD from contractors having electronic access to MVD records. The bill
seems to contain an exception from this prohibition if such information is “disclosed by a public
entity”. Misdemeanor criminal penalties are imposed for disclosure.
Significant Issues
TRD contracts with several entities which have access to TRD electronic information. For exam-
ple, Samba Holdings Inc. and Oso Grande Technologies Inc. pay the state for driving record in-
formation. They then resell that data to school districts, municipalities, trucking companies or
pg_0002
Senate Bill 199 -- Page 2
any company wanting information on employee driving records. Automobile dealers have access
to the TRD database when they register vehicles. It appears as if this bill attempts to afford those
contractors, and their customers, protection against disclosure of information submitted to TRD
during their contracts. TRD employees are already prohibited from disclosing personal informa-
tion about driver’s license or vehicle registration applicants, with certain exceptions. (66-2-
7.1A)
It is unclear as to the meaning of the exception for information disclosed by a public entity. The
exception seems to imply that if proprietary information or trade secrets, or customer information
is received from another governmental body, it may be disclosed.
The terms “trade secrets” and “proprietary information” are also not defined. Those terms are
therefore subject to interpretation by either TRD and the contractor, who may not agree.
Certain information covered by this bill may be received by TRD during the procurement and
contracting process and as the contract is implemented. For example, payment may be based
upon the number of customers serviced. This information would be made confidential under the
bill’s prohibition against disclosure of “customer information” or “financial information”. Gen-
erally proposals submitted in response to requests for proposals, executed contracts, and bills
submitted for payment by private contractors are public records subject to inspection. It is un-
clear whether this bill intends to prohibit the release of those documents, thereby creating an ex-
ception to the disclosure requirements in the Inspection of Public Records Act.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The AGO believes there may be a cost in defending the actions of TRD employees who interpret
the bill to either prohibit or allow disclosure of certain information.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD employees will be required to interpret the new prohibition and determine whether the in-
formation they receive is subject to disclosure. TRD might be subject to suits from either the
contractors seeking to prevent disclosure, the media or the public seeking disclosure.
DW/lg