Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Cravens
DATE TYPED 3/18/05
HB
SHORT TITLE NMFA Water Project Fund Projects
SB 186/aSCONC/aSFC
ANALYST Kehoe
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(See Fiscal Im-
pact Narrative)
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates House Bill 271
Relates to House Bill 139, Senate Bill 132, and Senate Bill 239
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Finance Authority (NMFA)
New Mexico Environment Department (ED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFC Amendments
The amendments adopted by the Senate Finance Committee add Elephant Butte in Sierra County
to the list of eligible projects and make the technical adjustments.
Synopsis of SCONC Amendment
The Senate Conservation amendments authorize the New Mexico Finance Authority to make
loans or grants from the water project fund to the following two entities: 1) to upper La Plata
domestic water consumers and mutual sewage works association in San Juan County for a water
project; and 2) to the Ute Creek soil and water conservation district in Harding county for a wa-
tershed restoration and management project. The amendment further makes punctuation correc-
tions to the bill.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 186 authorizes NMFA to make loans and grants from the water project fund to 16
qualified entities for water projects. The bill contains an emergency clause and will be effective
upon being signed by the Governor.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 186/aSCONC/aSFC-- Page 2
Significant Issues
The 2001 Legislature created the Water Project Finance Act establishing a water trust board, wa-
ter trust fund and water project fund for providing grants and loans to political subdivisions for
specific statewide regional water supply projects requiring legislative authorization. Laws of
2003 (Chapter 134) requires the Board of Finance to estimate by January 15 of each year the
available severance tax bond capacity and to authorize 10 percent of the capacity for deposit into
the water project fund to capitalize the fund for eligible projects. The senior severance tax ca-
pacity for this year totals $177.2 million which will yield $17.7 million into the water project
fund. Statute defines eligible projects as: 1) for the storage, conveyance or delivery of water to
end-users; 2) for the implementation of the Federal Endangered Species Act collaborative pro-
grams; 3) for the restoration and management of watersheds; 4) for flood control; or 5) for water
conservation.
The 16 projects recommended for legislative authorization within this bill have been reviewed
and evaluated by the Water Trust Board and are consistent with criteria established by statute.
The board consists of 15 members chaired by the state engineer or his designee.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Laws 2003, Chapter 134, requires that by January 15 of each year, the Board of Finance Division
(BOF) of the Department of Finance and Administration estimate the amount of bonding capac-
ity available for severance tax bonds to be authorized by the legislature. BOF shall authorize 10
percent of the estimated bonding capacity each year, and the legislature further authorized BOF
to issue severance tax bonds in the annually deducted amount for use by the water trust board to
fund water projects statewide. Money from the severance tax bonds may not be used to pay indi-
rect projects costs. Any unexpended balance from proceeds of the bonds issued for a water pro-
ject shall revert to the severance tax bonding fund within six months of completion of the water
project. NMFA is responsible for monitoring and ensuring proper reversions.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
NMFA administers the water project fund and provides staff support to the Water Trust Board.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 186 duplicates House Bill 271 in its entirety and relates to Senate Bills 132, 139, and
239.
Senate Bill 132 amends the Water Trust Board provisions to allow the executive director of
NMFA to name a designee to serve on the board in the director’s absence; eliminates creation of
the Drought Strike Task Force to avoid duplication of the Water Trust Board duties; allows do-
nations to the water project fund; and amends standards for prioritizing water projects by the
board.
House Bill 139 (HB 139) appropriates $100 million from the general fund to the water trust fund
for expenditure in fiscal years 2005 and 2006. Unexpended funds do not revert to the general
fund at the end of fiscal year 2006.
Senate Bill 239 makes technical changes to the membership of the Water Trust Board and re-
quires that 25 percent of all water project funds be expended for forest and watershed restoration
projects.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 186/aSCONC/aSFC-- Page 3
TECHNICAL ISSUES
NMFA offers the following amendments to Senate Bill 186 for the purposes of clarification and
to avoid conflicting claims on project funds:
1)
On page 2, line 15, insert the words “and/or” in lieu of the word “and”; and
2)
On page 2, line 17, following the word “counties”, insert the language “or another entity
which consists of water users from both of the aforementioned associations and which
have been approved by the water trust board.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The following statistics and graph prepared by NMFA depict the number of projects and dollar
value appropriated from the water project fund to date:
FY # Projects $ Amount
2002 5 $ 7.5 M
2003 14 10.0 M
2004 8 12.5 M
27 $30.0 M
A
LMK/lg
Appropriation History for Water Trust Board
$17,294,250
$22,783,521
$25,125,830
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
$45,000,000
FY2002
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005 (est.)
$12,500,000
$12,500,000
$10,000,000
$17,500,000
To date (FY2004), the state
investment of $35 million has
leveraged more than $40 million in
financing from the local entities. The
Water Trust Board estimates FY05
revenues will be matched with
local/federal contributions of $25
million.
State Appropriation
Local/Federal Contribution