Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Adair
DATE TYPED 1/31/05
HB
SHORT TITLE Prohibit Body Art for Minors
SB 81
ANALYST Medina
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to the Public Health Act (Section 24-1-1 through 24-1-28 NMSA 1978)
Companion to SB 80
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 81 amends the Public Health Act to make it unlawful for any person other than a
state-licensed physician or a person under the supervision of a state-licensed physician to admin-
ister or offer to administer body art upon a minor. Body art is defined as tattooing or any other
form of pigment implantation on the skin and scarification or branding of the skin.
Significant Issues
Senate Bill 81 does not include a regulation or enforcement provision.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 81 -- Page 2
According to the Attorney General’s staff analysis:
“Complete prohibition of body art upon a minor may be subject to First Amendment
challenge, although in Hodge v. S.T. Lynd, the federal district court, before deciding that
County fair dress code infringed on patron’s liberty interests, agreed that tattoos are sim-
ply a form of self-expression, not speech protected by First Amendment. 88 F.Supp.
1234, 1237 (D.N.M. 2000) (citation omitted).”
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
In the event of a judicial challenge to this legislation, or any other law or regulation that may be
impacted by it, the Office of the Attorney General anticipates administrative implications.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 80 requires parental or legal guardian consent for the administration of body art and
body piercing upon a minor.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
The administration or offer of administration of body art upon a minor would continue to be law-
ful.
DXM/lg