Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR HECS
DATE TYPED 03/10/05 HB 1091/HECS
SHORT TITLE Change School Calculation of MEM
SB
ANALYST Chabot
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
$20.0 Non-Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 854, HB 1083, SB 125, SB 274 and SB 1056
Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Response Received From
Public Education Department (PED) in responses to original HB 1083 and HB 1091
Public School Facilities Authority (PSFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 1091 amends Section 22-8-25 NMSA 1978 (State Equalization Guarantee Distribu-
tion—Definitions—Determination of Amount) to delete the requirement that a portion of local
and federal revenue be used for capital outlay and have PED calculate program units for charter
schools or school districts implementing formula-based programs for the first time based upon
current 40
th
day memberships. In addition, it changes the calculation of MEM for school dis-
tricts on the average of the prior year 80
th
and 120
th
day attendance. For school districts with 200
or less it is the average of the prior year 80
th
day and 120
th
day attendance or the 40
th
day of the
current year whichever is greater. The committee substitute combines features from HB 1083
and HB 1091.
Significant Issues
The statutory requirement for public school districts to designate an amount of state aid equal to
20 percent of local and federal revenue for capital outlay purposes is to assist the state in efforts
to ensure all schools meet the minimum levels of adequacy.
pg_0002
House Bill 1091/HECS -- Page 2
From discussion with the department, but not included in its analysis, New Mexico is certified as
an equalized state under Section 8009 of Title VIII—Public Law 103-381. This means the per
pupil expenditure at the 95
th
percentile compared to the 5
th
percentile does not vary by more than
25 percent. This allows New Mexico to deduct from state aid to the school district an amount
based upon the impact aid receipts. New Mexico currently uses approximately $58 million as a
credit from federal sources in determining the unit value under the State Equalization Guarantee
(SEG).
PFSA is concerned that removing the requirement to use 20 percent for capital outlay will cause
capital improvements needs of schools to compete against other operational needs of the district.
This may affect districts’ ability to meet match requirements for the Public School Capital Out-
lay Council (PSCOC) funded projects and limit a major funding source for completing projects
beyond the Statewide Adequacy Standards. However, there is nothing in the bill that would pre-
clude a public school district from using the 20 percent for capital outlay needs.
PED assesses not using the 40
th
day information except for growth calculations and new for-
mula-based programs will encourage school districts to retain student membership beyond the
40
th
day reporting program. This is a Governor’s initiative to kept students in school.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
This bill could indirectly be related to performance measures on student proficiency which may
improve because students stay in school.
PSFA will begin performance-based budgeting in FY06 and has a measure tied to the statewide
public school facility condition index. If public school districts are unable to meet match re-
quirements and make needed repairs, it will impact PSFA ability to meet performance goals re-
lating to improving the condition of school facilities.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
PED indicates that over the past four years, approximately $14.7 million has been budgeted for
public school capital outlay from the following sources: $2 million has been budgeted for capital
outlay from the .5 mill levy, $12.7 million from impact aid funds, and $119 thousand from the
forest reserves. While these funds may still be available, the statutory requirement to use them
for capital outlay purposes will be removed.
PFSA states there may be a negative impact to the Public School Capital Outlay Fund if the local
match requirements are reduced or waived. Increasing capital expenditures from funds gener-
ated for maintenance may affect districts’ ability to adequately maintain facilities. Federally im-
pacted lands typically have low assessed valuations which limit bonding capacity.
Changes to the public school funding formula modify the distribution of SEG to school districts
and charter schools. PED assesses some charters and school districts would potentially lose
some funding if membership continues to drop after the 40
th
day reporting period.
PED would have to reprogram the Accountability Data System to perform the required calcula-
tions and estimates the cost at $20 thousand.
pg_0003
House Bill 1091/HECS -- Page 3
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Executive, LESC and LFC have recommended a public school funding formula study in
FY2006; HB 2 as amended has a $200 thousand appropriation to the Legislative Council Service
to study the formula. If possible, changes to the funding formula should wait until the study is
complete and changes proposed to the Legislature during the 2006 session.
PFSA adds the following issues:
The most updated assessment of New Mexico school facilities performed by 3D International
shows a total estimated current cost for the life cycle building renewal and repair needs of $2.28
billion. The funding model to address this serious backlog of capital needs is predicated on an
average 50 percent local matching share to bring all public school facilities throughout the State
up to adequacy.
The Public School Capital Outlay Task Force was created in part in response to the Zuni lawsuit,
filed in January 1998, which challenged the constitutionality of the state's process for funding
public school capital outlay in the state that was in effect at the time. In 1999, the judge of the
eleventh judicial district court found that the state was in violation of the uniformity clause of the
New Mexico constitution (Article XII, Section 1) in the manner in which it funded capital outlay
for schools. The state was given until July 28, 2000 to correct past inequities and to establish
and implement a uniform system of funding for future capital improvements. The court ex-
tended the time frame to await the work of the 2000 task force after its creation.
Laws of 2001, Chapter 338 enacted various recommendations of the Public School Capital Out-
lay Task Force. The legislation established a framework for public school capital outlay and
provided one hundred percent state funding for correcting health and safety deficiencies at all
public schools in New Mexico, continued funding of the backlog of critical capital outlay needs
of school districts that had capped their own resources for public school capital improvements;
and implemented a long-term public school capital improvement process beginning September 1,
2003 that guarantees all school districts an adequate physical space, adequate educational suit-
ability and adequate technological infrastructure. The legislation also increased the funding for
maintenance and repair of schools so that the state investment in school facilities is safeguarded.
Finally, it established a permanent revenue source for public school capital outlay using supple-
mental severance tax bonds.
As of September, 2004, Laws of 2004, Chapter 125, required PSCOC to make public school
construction grant awards compliant with the new standards-based process adopted by PSCOC in
September 2003. PSCOC awarded $198.5 million for statewide public school construction in
FY2004-05. Of the $198.5 million, $124.7 million was awarded for 39 projects in the top of 100
ranked for schools of greatest need as listed in the New Mexico Condition Index (NMCI) rank-
ings. Of the total awarded, $73.8 million was allocated to complete projects partially funded in
the prior award cycle. Although no longer required by law, the awards provided $109.4 million
to Impact Aid districts, including Albuquerque.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
The calculation of units under the funding formula will not change and the provisions for using a
portion of impact aid and property tax levy for capital outlay will continue.
pg_0004
House Bill 1091/HECS -- Page 4
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
What will be the impact on capital outlay matching funds available to a public school dis-
trict.
2.
What has been the historic average of per student funding calculations under the federal
equalization determination.
3.
Can this change to the funding formula be held in abeyance until a formula study is com-
pleted and recommendations made to the 2006 Legislature.
GAC/yr:lg