Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Gardner
DATE TYPED 02/25/05 HB 1040
SHORT TITLE Payment of Public Retirees Returning to Work
SB
ANALYST Geisler
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
Significant Recurring
General, Other
State Funds,
Federal
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Conflicts with: HB 207, SB 788, SB 875, HB 1024
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
Corrections Department (DOC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Effective July 1, 2005, House Bill 1040 would require PERA affiliates who employ PERA retir-
ees to pay the retired member’s contribution as provided by the PERA Act.
Significant Issues
House Bill 1040 transfers the financial responsibility for making the PERA employee contribu-
tion for return to work retirees from the employee to the employer. Retirees who return to work
with public-affiliated employers are required to remit nonrefundable retired member contribu-
tions when their post-retirement earnings reach $25,000. Retired member contributions will con-
tinue to be required through December 31, 2006, allowing for two full years of actuarial experi-
ence to determine the full actuarial cost of PERA’s expanded return-to-work provisions. Begin-
ning January 1, 2007, the employer contribution rate will be adjusted annually at the determina-
tion of PERA to cover the full actuarial cost of PERA retirees for post-retirement employment
with PERA affiliates.
pg_0002
House Bill 1040 -- Page 2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The impact to PERA is neutral as it will still receive the same combined contribution level from
employers and employees. The cost will increase for PERA-affiliated employers who choose to
hire PERA retirees since they will have to pay the retired member’s contributions to the PERA
fund. The Corrections Department provided an estimate of the cost increase to the employer of
$1,885 per return to work retiree. Not all of the approximately 1,500 retirees who have returned
to work will earn $25,000 which will trigger the employee contribution. However, if one-third
of the group does exceed the cap, and the employer paid the $1,885 required employee share for
the employee the fiscal impact would be approximately $942 thousand per year.
PERA notes that since it will be more expensive for an employer to hire a retiree rather than an
active PERA member this may influence the hiring practices of public employers. This may
trigger later retirements and there may be a gain to the Fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
HB 1040 will have a minimal administrative effect on PERA. Under current law, retirees remit
nonrefundable retired member contributions when post-retirement earnings reach $25,000 and
will be required to do so through December 31, 2006. Whether the employer or the retiree is re-
sponsible for paying the contributions, the employer is responsible to remit both the retiree or
employer portions to PERA.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP OR RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 207 will reinstate an earnings limitation for retired members returning to work to
$30,000. The earnings limitation will not be applicable to retired members who are already em-
ployed by an affiliated-public employer prior to July 1, 2005, who will continue to make retired
member contributions through December 31, 2006. Beginning January 1, 2007, the employer
contribution rate for these retired members will be adjusted annually at the determination of
PERA to cover the full actuarial cost to the Fund of their post-retirement employment.
Senate Bill 788 would exempt retired state police members and retired municipal police mem-
bers from the PERA Act’s statutory 90-day separation from service requirement to temporarily
fill certain vacant public safety positions, which result from an active employee’s activation or
deployment to a federal call to active duty.
SB 875 raises the threshold for remitting nonrefundable retired member contributions for post-
retirement earnings to $30,000, and repeals the sunset provision for retired member contributions
(December 31, 2006). SB 875 lengthens the separation from service requirement for post-
retirement employment, including independent contractors, to 12 months.
House Bill 1024 amends the PERA Act to limit those PERA–affiliated public employers eligible
to hire retired PERA members to: 1) a municipality with a population of less than 20,000; or 2) a
county with a population of less than 50,000.
pg_0003
House Bill 1040 -- Page 3
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Since removal of its earning limitation for retirees who return to work with affiliated-public em-
ployers, PERA has experienced historically heavier end-of-year retirements. For example, for
the year 2004 PERA retired 1,878 of its members. The number of back-to-work-retirees has es-
calated from 363 on October 31, 2003 to 1,501 through December 31, 2004. The number of re-
tirees who have returned to work correlates very closely with the increased retirements in 2004
and represents approximately 7% of annuitant payroll.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
Retirees who return to work with public-affiliated employers will be responsible for remitting
nonrefundable retired member contributions when their post-retirement earnings reach $25,000
until December 31, 2006.
AMENDMENTS
PERA suggest clearer language relating to the employer paying the employee contribution:
On page 3, line 9, after the word share, delete the word “of” and replace it with the word “for”.
GG/lg