Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Garcia, MP
DATE TYPED 3-2-2005 HB 872
SHORT TITLE Gas Vapor Recovery System Tax Credit
SB
ANALYST Taylor
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
($50.0)
($100.0)
Recurring State General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)
SUMMARY
House Bill 872 provides tax for the costs paid for the installation of “stage II vapor recovery sys-
tems” at gasoline stations. The credit can be applied against the station owners’ personal or cor-
porate income tax bill. Stage II vapor recovery systems are defined as “a system that captures
and transfers at minimum ninety-five percent by weight of gasoline vapors that are generated
during motor vehicle refueling into a gasoline dispensing facility’s stationary tanks”.
The bill has an effective date of January 1, 2005.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Taxation and Revenue Department estimates that the tax credit will reduce state general
fund dollars by $50 thousand in FY05 and $100 thousand in FY06. Their estimate notes that the
fiscal impact depends on how many station owners take advantage of the tax credit incentive.
They also note that the cost per station is likely to vary widely—from $3,500 per station to sev-
eral times that. They suggest that absent federal or state mandates, participation will be low, and
thus the relatively low fiscal impact.
Given the uncertainty about participation, it should be recognized that any fiscal impact estimate
for this type of legislation cannot be very precise, and therefore the risk associated with the esti-
mate is relatively high.