Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Cervantes
DATE TYPED 02/25/05 HB 495/aHJC
SHORT TITLE Structured Settlement Protection Act
SB
ANALYST Ford
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
Minimal – See Narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Attorney General (AGO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HJC Amendment
The House Judiciary Committee Amendment makes a grammatical change and specifies that an
application for approval of a transfer of a structured settlement shall be made in court, rather than
“an appropriate court.” This serves to clarify that the application must be made in the court pur-
suant to the definition in the bill.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 495 enacts the Structured Settlement Protection Act, which requires court approval
for the transfer of structured settlements and provides the procedures for the transfer of struc-
tured settlements.
Definitions
The bill creates definitions for terms used in the Act, including:
“annuity issuer” means an insurer that has issued a contract to fund periodic payments
under a structured settlement.
pg_0002
House Bill 495/aHJC -- Page 2
“payee” means an individual who is receiving tax-free payments under a structured set-
tlement and proposes to transfer payment rights under the structured settlement.
“transferee” means a party acquiring or proposing to acquire structured settlement pay-
ment rights through a transfer.
Required Disclosures
The Act requires the transferee to provide specific disclosures in a separate statement to the
payee at least three days before the payee signs the transfer agreement. Among others, the re-
quirements include the discounted present value of the payments, an itemized list of expenses,
and a statement that the payee has the right to cancel the transfer agreement, without penalty or
further obligation, not later than the close of the third business day after the date the agreement is
signed by the payee.
Court Approval and Procedures:
The Act requires a transfer of a structured settlement to be approved by a court based on findings
that:
The transfer is in the best interest of the payee, taking into account the welfare and sup-
port of the payee’s dependents;
The payee has been advised in writing by the transferee to seek independent professional
advice regarding the transfer and has either received the advice or knowingly waived the
advice in writing; and
The transfer does not contravene any applicable statute or any order of any court or other
governmental authority.
The Act also specifies the procedures the transferee must follow to obtain court approval which
includes a required notification to all interested parties at least 20 days before the scheduled
court hearing. Interested parties shall be entitled to provide input on the proposed transfer.
Liability and Responsibility
The Act establishes that the transferee, not the payee, obligor or annuity issuer, is responsible for
taxes, costs and other liabilities that may arise from the transfer if the transfer contravenes the
terms of the structured settlement.
The Act also establishes that it is the responsibility of the transferee to comply with the condi-
tions of the Act. Neither the obligor nor the annuity issuer bears any responsibility for, or liabil-
ity arising from, noncompliance.
Significant Issues
AOC notes that the bill is intended to protect persons who should benefit from a structured set-
tlement from ill-considered transfers.
AGO writes: “There is a substantial potential for abuse or undue influence when a payee or the
injured person’s guardian seeks to convert periodic payments from a structured settlement of a
damages award or a workers’ compensation settlement that is designed to provide for support
pg_0003
House Bill 495/aHJC -- Page 3
and care of the injured person over life or a term of years into cash.”
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill may increase costs to the courts as a result of the requirement that transfers be approved
by the courts. The total fiscal impact will depend on the number of applications for approval.
AGO notes that the bill may also save the state money by preventing ill-advised transfers that
could cause individuals to seek public assistance, such as Medicaid, in the future.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The AGO raises a number of issues with the drafting of the bill. First, it notes that the bill re-
quires court approval of any transfer, but the approval procedures do not require that the court
actually hold an evidentiary hearing to determine if the proposed transfer meets the requirements.
Next, the AGO notes that Section 4(B) allows the payee to waive independent professional ad-
vice, which may lead to transferees preparing boilerplate waiver language for the payee’s for
signature. The AGO suggests that the bill require the court to determine that the waiver was in-
telligent and informed.
Finally, the AGO raises a concern regarding transfers made by a parent or guardian on behalf of
a minor or an incapacitated person. The AGO suggests that the bill could require the court to
appoint its own independent professional, at the transferee’s expense, to review the merits of the
transfer to provide better protections. Along these lines, the bill could be strengthened by requir-
ing a physician’s statement of the injured person’s mental and physical condition and long-term
prognosis.
EF/yr:sb