Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Gonzales
DATE TYPED 3/18/05
HB
460/aHTC/aHJC
/aHAFC/aSFC
SHORT TITLE Off-Highway Vehicle Safety & Fee Requirements
SB
ANALYST Moser
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
0 +
0 +
$90 +
Recurring
State Road Fund (2
yr. registration)
0 +
0 +
$30 +
Recurring Local Governments (2
yr. registration)
$50 +
$115 +
$166 +
Recurring Motor Vehicle Divi-
sion (registration)
*
*
*
Recurring Department of Game
and Fish
$ 300 ++
$690 ++
$995 ++
Recurring
Trail Safety Fund
(user permit fee)
$10 ++
$23 ++
$33 ++
Recurring NM Clean and Beau-
tiful Program
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
The “+” indicates additional revenue from nonresident annual registration fees.
The “++” indicates additional revenue from nonresident annual user permit fees and nonresident 90-day permit fees.
* Department of Game and Fish – the number of transactions that would be conducted by the Department of Game
and Fish is unknown – also see Technical Issues.
Assumptions: 60,000 registered vehicles, plus some unknown number of nonresident permits (+, ++).
The fiscal impact does not include any increased compliance regarding off-highway vehicle registrations. Pre-
sumable a very large number of off-road vehicles are not currently registered, and the fiscal impact estimate
assumes full compliance currently. Therefore, the positive fiscal impact to the State Road Fund and local
governments is very much understated. Similarly, if very few three-year registrations are currently in place,
the out-year fiscal impacts would manifest more quickly.
The revenue illustration excludes some minor amount of dealer demonstration certificate fees.
Note: Since the ATV registration is changed from a 3 year period to a 2 year period, there is a positive fiscal impact
on the State Road Fund and Local Governments beginning in the 3
rd
year after the effective date. The bill includes
no transition provision for existing 3-year registrations, so the full revenue impact will not be realized until FY2009
(when 3-year registrations obtained at the end of calendar year 2005 are due for renewal).
Duplicates
SB-252
pg_0002
House Bill 460/aHTC/aHJC/aHAFC/aSFC -- Page 2
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Corrections Department (CD)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
FOR THE LEGISLATIVE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFC Amendment
The Senate Finance Committee Amendment exempts individuals who operate off-highway mo-
tor vehicles on privately held lands from the provisions of the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Act.
The amendment additionally changes the authority of the off-highway motor vehicle safety board
from making determination of locations of off-highway motor vehicle parks, facilities and trail
locations and restoration projects to that of making recommendation “…to the state, county,
tribal or local governing body or private entity that owns or administers the land upon which the
tracks or trails are located.”
Synopsis of HAFC Amendment
The House Appropriation and Finance Committee Amendment increases the size of the Off
Highway Safety Board from 15 members to 17 members with the new members being one from
the US bureau of land management and one from the US forest service. Both appointments
would be made by the governor.
Synopsis of HTC Amendment
House Transportation Committee Amendment restores present law language that exempts from
regulation vehicles owned by non-residents and brought into the state only for competition. The
only difference from present law, after the amendment, is that the current limit on the exemption
to 15-day period is stricken. Permits 15 year olds with an instructional permit or provisional li-
cense to operate an off-road vehicle without supervision. Competition vehicles are exempted
from noise regulation. ATV use is allowed on state lands where permitted by the Secretary of
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources. Other amendments are clean-up and tracking lan-
guage.
HTC and HJC Amendments have addressed known technical issues identified by the NMDOT.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 460 revises sections of the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Act providing a number of
new safety and safety training provisions, and imposing a new off-highway user fee directed to
the new Trail Safety Fund. The current three-year off-highway vehicle registration fee amount is
increased from the current $15 to be a two-year registration for $17, with portions of the fee di-
rected to the Motor Vehicle Division to offset additional costs associated with the provisions of
the bill.
pg_0003
House Bill 460/aHTC/aHJC/aHAFC/aSFC -- Page 3
This review addresses the fiscal impact aspects of the bill, and does not address the safety issues
or the off-highway trail development aspects of the bill.
Significant Issues
The fiscal impact shown on page 1 does not include any increased compliance regarding off-
highway vehicle registrations. Presumably a very large number of off-road vehicles are not cur-
rently registered, and the fiscal impact estimate assumes full compliance currently. Therefore,
the positive fiscal impact to the State Road Fund and local governments is very much under-
stated.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
The Department of Finance and Administration feels that this bill is convoluted and performance
based budgeting will be difficult to administer.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The NMDOT makes the following assumptions: 60,000 registered vehicles, plus some unknown
number of nonresident permits (+, ++).
The fiscal impact does not include any increased compliance regarding off-highway vehicle reg-
istrations. Presumably a very large number of off-road vehicles are not currently registered, and
the fiscal impact estimate assumes full compliance currently. Therefore, the positive fiscal im-
pact to the State Road Fund and local governments is very much understated. Similarly, if very
few three-year registrations are currently in place, the out-year fiscal impacts would manifest
more quickly.
The revenue illustration excludes some minor amount of dealer demonstration certificate fees.
Note: Since the ATV registration is changed from a 3 year period to a 2 year period, there is a
positive fiscal impact on the State Road Fund and Local Governments beginning in the 3
rd
year
after the effective date. The bill includes no transition provision for existing 3-year registrations,
so the full revenue impact will not be realized until FY2009 (when 3-year registrations obtained
at the end of calendar year 2005 are due for renewal).
DFA indicates that an indeterminate appropriation impact will be seen and revenues are esti-
mated as follows based upon assumptions in FY06 of 1000 new registrations in state and 200 out
of state users:
Registration fees - $20.4
User fees - $36.0
Clean and Beautiful Program $1.2
The registration fees shall be distributed as follows:
Division $6.0
Motor Vehicle Suspense Fund - $14.4
The special user fee shall be distributed as follows:
Game and Fish Game Protection Fund - $7.00 out of each user fee collected by Game and Fish.
Remainder of fee if collected by Game and Fish, or all of fee if collected by another agency, to
Trail Safety Fund
pg_0004
House Bill 460/aHTC/aHJC/aHAFC/aSFC -- Page 4
There are approximately 40,000 ATV's currently registered (from last years FIR, HB 257). If all
these vehicles require re-registration in FY07 the fiscal impact would be:
Registration fees - $680.0
User fees - $1,200.0
Clean and Beautiful Program $40.0
The registration fees shall be distributed as follows:
Division $200.0
Motor Vehicle Suspense Fund - $480.0
The special user fee would be distributed as follows:
Game and Fish Game Protection Fund - $7.00 out of each user fee collected by Game and Fish.
Remainder of fee if collected by Game and Fish, or all of fee if collected by another agency, to
Trail Safety Fund
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
DFA indicates that the fees may be collected by the Department of Tourism, in conjunction with
Department of Game and Fish for both residents and non-residents. How a field officer will
check out of state registration is a concern. How Department of Tourism will implement a sys-
tem for charging user fees is not addressed in the bill.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
SB-252 is a duplicate
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The NMDOT offers the following:
On page 13, line 24 the term “driver’s license” should be replaced with the terms “in-
structional permit or provisional license” applicable to persons age 15 through 17 years.
Section 4, Subsection F presents a technical conflict with other provisions in Section 4,
Subsections A through E of the bill. Section 4, Subsection (F) states: “Notwithstanding
the provisions of Subsections A through E of this section, seven dollars ($7.00) shall be
distributed to the department of game and fish for each fee that the department of game
and fish collects.” The problem here is that Subsections A through E distribute all of the
fees in very specific amounts. The “notwithstanding” provision leaves the Motor Ve-
hicle Division (MVD) in the role of deciding a substantive provision of law with no
guidance from the Legislature. Subsections A through E generally direct $5 of the reg-
istration fee to MVD, $12 of the registration fee to the Section 66-6-23 distribution (or to
the Trail Safety Fund in the case of a 90 day nonresident permit), the off-highway user
permit fee to the Trail Safety Fund, and the $1 NM Clean & Beautiful fee to the Tourism
Department. If $7.00 is directed to the Department of Game and Fish, the MVD must
decide what entities will receive less revenue than is specified in the other distribution
sections, and the bill suggests no guidance for this decision. This particular provision
was amended into last year’s bill in the Senate Finance Committee late in the session, and
pg_0005
House Bill 460/aHTC/aHJC/aHAFC/aSFC -- Page 5
there was no time to repair this conflict before the legislature adjourned.
When the Department of Game and Fish conducts the transaction, there may be less need
to reimburse MVD their $5 portion of the fee. The remaining $2, or possibly the entire
$7, necessary to cover the Game and Fish reimbursement would have to come either from
the Section 66-6-23 distribution to the State Road Fund and local governments (2 year
permits), or from the distribution to the Trail Safety Fund (90 day nonresident permits).
It seems likely MVD would choose to keep its $5 share and take the $7 Game and Fish
share out of the other recipients’ portion.
The “notwithstanding” provision of Section 4, Subsection F may also require additional
clarification. The distribution to the Game Protection Fund is specified to be “$7 for
each fee collected”. Presumably the Game and Fish Department might: 1) register a
resident’s vehicle involving 2 fees; 2) register a nonresident’s vehicle for a two-year pe-
riod involving 2 fees; or, 3) issue a 90-day permit involving 1 fee. It is unclear whether
Game and Fish might receive $14 on some transactions that involve 2 fees, and $7 on
other transactions that involve only 1 fee.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
DFA questions why the Department of Tourism would be responsible for charging a fee to tour-
ists is novel.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
Off-highway vehicles will continue to be registered at $15.00. New safety regulations would not
go into effect.
EM/yr:lg:rs