Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Stewart
DATE TYPED 03/12/05 HB 286/aSEC
SHORT TITLE School Principal Salary Calculation
SB
ANALYST Chabot
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
See Narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SEC amendment to HB 286
The Senate Education Committee amendment to House Bill 286 amends the title and provides
that if a level 3-A teacher does not demonstrate essential competency in any given school year,
the district shall provide professional development and peer intervention during the following
school year. If the teacher still fails to demonstrate essential competency, the school district may
choose not to contract with the teacher to teach in the classroom.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 286 amends Section 22-10A-2 NMSA 1978 of the School Personnel Act to include
the definitions of an “instructional leader”, and “responsibility factor”. It strikes existing mini-
mum principal salaries in statute and replaces it with minimum salaries for principals and assis-
tant principals based upon a ten-month contract tied to the minimum salary for a level 3-A
teacher multiplied by the responsibility factor. Upon demonstration of instruction leader compe-
tence through highly objective uniform statewide standard of evaluation, minimum salaries
would be as follows:
pg_0002
House Bill 286/aSEC -- Page 2
SCHOOL YEAR 2006-07 (FY07)
Position
Level 3-A
Minimum
Responsibility
Factor
Minimum
Salary
High School Principal
$45,000
1.60 $72,000
High School Assistant Principal
$45,000
1.25 $56,250
Middle or Junior High School Principal
$45,000
1.40 $63,000
Middle or Junior High School Assistant Principal
$45,000
1.15 $51,750
Elementary School Principal
$45,000
1.20 $54,000
Elementary School Assistant Principal
$45,000
1.10 $49,500
SCHOOL YEAR 2007-07 (FY08)
Position
Level 3-A
Minimum
Responsibility
Factor
Minimum
Salary
High School Principal
$50,000
1.60 $80,000
High School Assistant Principal
$50,000
1.25 $62,500
Middle or Junior High School Principal
$50,000
1.40 $70,000
Middle or Junior High School Assistant Principal
$50,000
1.15 $57,500
Elementary School Principal
$50,000
1.20 $60,000
Elementary School Assistant Principal
$50,000
1.10 $55,000
Significant Issues
The Three-Tiered Teacher Licensure established minimum salaries for teachers. However, ac-
cording to DFA, a number of states, including New Mexico, are experiencing difficulties in re-
cruiting and retaining principles. The National Conference of State Legislatures predicts by
2008, the number of principals needed is expected to increase 20 percent. The Office of Educa-
tional Accountability and the University of New Mexico surveyed approximately 70 percent of
New Mexico schools and found the average principal tenure is 2.8 years and 51 percent of the
schools responding had 3 to 7 principals in the last ten years. The LESC School Principal Work
Group identified 701 principals and 333 assistant principals in the 89 school districts.
Principals are identified in the bill as the instructional leader for school and continuity is a criti-
cal factor in improving instruction.
The Senate Education Amendment adds the provision of requiring professional development and
peer intervention for level 3-A teachers not demonstrating professional competencies. It pro-
vides that the school district may choose not to contract with the teacher to teach in the class-
room if the professional competencies are demonstrated after the professional development and
peer intervention. In addition, school districts will have to comply with all due process require-
ments related to employment and termination proceedings established by the district policies and
also consider any teacher union contracts related to termination or change of duties.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
If minimum salaries improve recruitment and retention of principals and assistant principals, im-
proved student outcomes may result.
pg_0003
House Bill 286/aSEC -- Page 3
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
No appropriation is contained in this bill; however, increases in program costs in the State
Equalization Guarantee will result as the minimum salaries are implemented. In the presentation
to LESC in November 2004, recurring costs were estimated at $2.5 million for FY07 and $4.1
for FY08. Actual costs will be determined by the salaries being paid at the start of each year. In
addition, DFA estimates $200 thousand will be needed to develop the evaluation framework for
principals and assistant principals that is to be in place before the minimum salaries become ef-
fective.
PED estimates $175 thousand will be needed to design the required evaluation system which will
need to be in place by end of the 2005-06 school year. It states the agency cannot absorb the cost
within the appropriated budget. The agency suggests using contractors would be the best way to
design the evaluation system.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
House Bill 286 should be amended to include an appropriation of $175 thousand to fund the de-
velopment of the required evaluation system.
ALTERNATIVES
Leave the statute unchanged and pay principals based upon school student population (200 or
fewer, $58,000; 201 to 400, $60,000; 401 to 600, $62,000; 601 to 800, $64,000; 801 to 1,000,
$66,000; and more than 1,001, $68,000). Assistant principals are not included in the current
statute.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
The statute will remain unchanged.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
Should principal and assistant principal salaries be a negotiated item without having a
minimum salary level.
GAC/lg