Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lujan
DATE TYPED 03/14/05 HB 242/a HTRC
SHORT TITLE Expand Film Production Tax Credit Eligibility
SB
ANALYST Padilla-Jackson
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
($250.0)*
($250.0)
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
At this time, the TRD fiscal impact analysis was not available for the amended bill. Upon the
receipt of this analysis, the estimate will be revised, if necessary.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD) (none received for HTRC amendment)
SUMMARY
House Bill 242 as Amended by House Taxation and Revenue Committee
The House Taxation and Revenue Committee (HTRC) amended House Bill 242. The amend-
ments appear to be fairly minor. One amendment changes the wording regarding the application
to TRD to include a certification of the amount of direct production expenditures or “post pro-
duction expenditures”, striking “technology expenditures”. Another amendment modifies the
definition of “postproduction” to mean an expenditure that occurs after the completion of princi-
pal and ongoing photography including an expenditure for editing, Foley recording, automatic
dialogue replacement, sound editing, special effects, including computer-generated imagery or
other effects scoring and music editing, beginning and end credits, negative cutting, soundtrack
production, dubbing, subtitling or addition of sound or visual effects; but not including an ex-
penditure for advertising, marketing distribution or expense payments.
The original bill defined "postproduction" to mean the final stage in the production of a film that
occurs after the completion of principal and ongoing photography and includes editing, Foley
pg_0002
House Bill 242/aHTRC -- Page 2
recording, automatic dialogue replacement, sound editing, special effects, scoring and music ed-
iting, beginning and end credits, negative cutting, soundtrack production, dubbing, subtitling and
addition of sound or visual effects, but does not include advertising, marketing or expense pay-
ments.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 242 makes several changes to the Film Production Tax Credit, including expanding
eligibility for the 15 percent film production tax credit and increasing requirements for film pro-
duction company applicants.
Expanded Eligibility
The bill expands eligibility by allowing postproduction expenditures that are: (1) attributable to
the production of a commercial audiovisual product (a film or videogame for commercial exploi-
tation) (2) services performed in New Mexico, and (3) subject to taxation in New Mexico. The
bill defines postproduction as the final stage in the production of a film, including but not limited
to editing, special effects, beginning and ending credits and excluding advertising, marketing, or
expense payments.
Additional Requirement
House Bill 242 includes provisions to increase the requirements by stating that the film produc-
tion company must agree in writing to the following:
Pay all obligations the film production company has incurred in New Mexico;
Publish in local newspapers, once a week for three consecutive weeks, to notify the pub-
lic of the need to file creditor claims against the film production company by a specified
date;
That outstanding obligations are not waived should a creditor fail to file by the specified
date; and
Delay filing of a claim for the film production tax credit until the New Mexico film divi-
sion delivers written notification to the Taxation and Revenue Department that the film
production company has fulfilled all requirements for the credit.
The effective date of this act is July 1, 2005.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
At this time, the TRD fiscal impact analysis was not available for the amended bill. Upon the
receipt of this analysis, the estimate will be revised, if necessary.
According to TRD’s revised analysis of the original bill, House Bill 242 would have a -$250
thousand impact to the General Fund in FY06. According to TRD, the bill is expected to in-
crease utilization of film credits by expanding eligibility to include post-production services pro-
vided in New Mexico for films shot outside the state. According to TRD, approximately $5 mil-
lion in credits has been claimed under current law in the past two and a half years. They note
that the 1997 Economic Census for New Mexico reports total revenue of “post-production and
other motion picture and video industries” was $2.1 million. TRD’s estimate assumes a $250
thousand annual increase in credits for production activities not previously eligible for the credit.
pg_0003
House Bill 242/aHTRC -- Page 3
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to TRD, the Department will face modest administrative expenses in making the tran-
sition to implement the new eligibility allowed under the bill.
OPJ/lg:yr