Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Moore
DATE TYPED 2/1/2005 HB 189
SHORT TITLE Notice Requirements For Criminal Trespass
SB
ANALYST Aguilar
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney Generals Office (AGO)
Commissioner of Public Lands (SLO)
Public Defender Department (PDD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 189 requires hunters and fisherman to obtain written permission from landowners to
hunt or fish on posted private property, modifies the notice of consent and changes posting re-
quirements.
The bill also directs that any game animal, game bird or game fish taken, captured or killed on
private property without written permission shall be confiscated.
Significant Issues
House Bill 189 strengthens the rights of private property owners to exclude people from their
lands.
A number of very public differences over access to and use of public land has arisen over the last
two years particularly in those checkerboard areas where parcels of private land and public lands
are intermingled. Often these lands are fenced by the lessee as part of large tracts. While the
public generally has access to trust lands for various purposes, the bill places the responsibility
on the person who seeks to enter to secure the permission of the owner.
pg_0002
House Bill 189 -- Page 2
TECHNICAL ISSUES
HB 189 modifies the current Criminal Trespass bill (Section 30-14-1 NMSA 1978) by defining
the notice an owner may use to exclude others from un-posted lands to include “written commu-
nication” or the existence of fencing. The lack of definition of “written communication” could
present a problem in enforcement because it does not indicate where or how such written com-
munication must be done.
The Attorney General’s Office notes that HB 189 also changes the notice provisions in Sections
30-14-1.1 and 30-14-6, NMSA 1978, to allow posting by “written communication” as well as the
placement of fencing or signs in places likely to be seen by visitors; and adds a new posting
technique which uses vertical stripes of orange paint placed on trees and sign posts at certain
heights and intervals. This provision may prove difficult to enforce because the crime of crimi-
nal trespass, as defined by the New Mexico Supreme Court in its Uniform Jury Instruction 14-
402, requires that the defendant “knew or should have known” that permission to enter had been
denied. When property is posted by signs proclaiming it closed that is relatively easy to prove;
however, the use of orange paint would require proving that the defendant knew or should have
known the meaning of the paint stripes, which could be very difficult to prove and would depend
on the widespread understanding of the significance of such stripes. In the hunting context, this
could be dealt with by informing all hunters of the stripes meaning as part of the licensing proc-
ess.
The State Land Office notes page 5 lines 15-16 exempt from posting requirements in the bill
“property owned by the state and federal government.” For clarification this should read “prop-
erty owned by the state and federal government and state trust lands.”
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Department of Game and Fish notes this bill makes it unlawful to hunt and take game ani-
mals if trespassing on private property in violation of Section 30-14-1 NMSA 1978. The impli-
cations of the unlawful taking of a game animal on private property only apply to those lands
that are “posted” against trespassing. The violation of criminal trespassing has several more fac-
ets pursuant to Section 30-14-1 that would not apply, such as being on private property after the
landowner has told the person to leave. Consideration should be given as to deleting the restric-
tion to just posted property and include any time that an individual is on private property in vio-
lation of Section 30-14-1. Department officers often deal with trespassers that come back to hunt
even after access has been denied to them.
PA/lg