Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may also be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Hobbs
DATE TYPED 2/07/2005 HB 50
SHORT TITLE Military Retirement Pay Income Tax Exemption
SB
ANALYST Taylor
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
FY05
FY06
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
(6,000.0) (12,000.0)
(12,000.0) Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to HB 27, SB 94, SB 349 and SB 63
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
House Bill 50 exempts military retirement paid to New Mexico residents who served in the U.S.
military or to their surviving spouses from state income taxation. The bill is applicable to tax
years beginning on or after January 1, 2005.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The fiscal estimates contained in this report have been revised to reflect the latest information
from the Taxation and Revenue Department. The most important change was lowering the as-
sumed applicable tax rate from 5 percent to 3.2 percent. Of course, lowering the assumed rate
has the effect of lowering the estimated general fund revenue loss.
TRD’s fiscal impact analysis indicates that this bill would decrease state income tax revenues by
$ 6.0 million in FY05 and $12.0 million in FY06 and subsequent years. The full year estimate
(FY06) assumes: there are 21,300 military retirees in the state; average annual pension is
$17,650; and the average applicable tax rate is 3.2 percent, or about $565 per eligible taxpayer.
Multiplying $565 by 21,300 retirees implies a full year revenue loss of about $12.0 million. The