Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Fox-Young
DATE TYPED 1/31/05
HB 24
SHORT TITLE Counting of Voting-Machine-Rejected Ballots
SB
ANALYST Medina
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to the Election Code
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Secretary of State
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 24 amends the Election Code with a requirement that an absent voter precinct board
member, in the presence of two challengers from different political parties, create a duplicate of
a rejected absentee ballot. Rejected absentee ballots are defined as ballots damaged, defective or
marked in a manner that results in its rejection by a voting machine. The bill requires that the
duplicate ballot be labeled with a serial number and then counted and tallied by a voting ma-
chine. The duplicate ballot would then accompany the original ballot and be handled in the same
manner as an emergency ballot. If there is a recount, a candidate my request that rejected ballots
and their duplicates be rechecked for accuracy and then recounted.
Significant Issues
The bill calls for the judgment of a absent voter precinct board member to be the correct interpre-
tation of the voter’s intent. Also, if the markings on a ballot are truly duplicated, the ballot would
again be rejected.
pg_0002
House Bill 24 -- Page 2
TECHNICAL ISSUES
According to the Secretary of State:
“Section 1-6-10, Subsection C NMSA 1978: “At 5:00 p.m. on the Monday immediately
preceding the date of election, the county clerk shall record the numbers of the unused
absentee ballots and shall publicly destroy in the county clerk’s office all such unused
ballots. The county clerk shall execute a certificate of destruction, which shall include
the numbers on the absentee ballots destroyed. A copy of the certificate of destruction
shall be sent to the secretary of state. All voting machines in New Mexico are pro-
grammed to reject spoiled ballots for hand tallying. If a determination is made that the
ballot cannot be hand tallied then it is rejected.”
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
Rejected absentee ballots would continue to be handled and destroyed as prescribed by current
statute.
DXM/lg