Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Begaye
DATE TYPED 01/24/05 HB 16
SHORT TITLE Return to Employment for Public Retirees
SB
ANALYST Geisler
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
NFI See narrative
$.01 See Narrative Recurring PERA Trust Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to: HB 207
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
New Mexico Municipal League
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 16 amends the PERA Act to reinstate an earnings limitation of $15,000 for PERA
retirees who return-to-work with a PERA affiliated-public employer before suspension of pen-
sion benefits. Further, HB 16 eliminates the exemption for retirees who are employed during the
legislative session for legislative session work.
Significant Issues
Under current law, retirees who return to work with public-affiliated employers are required to
remit nonrefundable retired member contributions when their post-retirement earnings reach
$25,000. As of December 31, 2004, affiliated-public employers have re-hired approximately
1,501 retirees under the PERA Act’s back-to-work provisions. Effective July 1, 2005, HB16
would reinstate an earnings limitation of $15,000 for such post-retirement employment with af-
filiated-public employers and would be applicable to those retirees already re-employed. Upon
reaching the $15,000 earnings limitation, pension benefits for those affected retirees would be
pg_0002
House Bill 16 -- Page 2
suspended, the former retired members would become contributing PERA members and would
accrue service credit until employment terminated.
Under current law, retirees who return to work for the legislature for legislative session work are
exempt from the requirement of making retiree contributions to the Fund. HB 16 removes this
exemption. As a result, retired members who return to work for the legislature during the legis-
lative session will have their pensions suspended when the retired member’s earnings reach
$15,000.
The Municipal League notes that municipalities continue to have difficulty in retaining and find-
ing employees in rural areas and that the return to work provision has helped rural employers
retain valuable employees. Employers are not required to hire back retirees—the provision is
optional. In addition, the return to work legislation provides for contributions to cover any nega-
tive actuarial cost caused by the return to work legislation. Since the return to work provision
was just implemented in 2004, the Municipal League requests that the legislature allow the pro-
vision to remain in place and allow PERA to monitor the effect over time.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
PERA states that HB 16 may have a positive fiscal impact on the fund. Since removal of its
earning limitation for retirees who return to work with affiliated-public employers, PERA has
experienced historically heavier end-of-year retirements. For example, for the year 2004 PERA
retired 1,878 of its members. The number of back-to-work-retirees has escalated from 363 on
October 31, 2003 to 1,501 through December 31, 2004. The number of retirees who have re-
turned to work correlates very closely with the increased retirements in 2004 and represents ap-
proximately 7% of annuitant payroll.
Under current law, retired member contributions will continue to be required through December
31, 2006, allowing for two full years of actuarial experience to determine the full actuarial cost
of PERA’s expanded return-to-work provisions. Beginning January 1, 2007, the employer con-
tribution rate will be adjusted annually at PERA’s determination to cover the full actuarial cost
of PERA retirees for post-retirement employment with PERA affiliates. It is unknown whether
removal of the earnings limitation for post-retirement employment will require PERA’s actuaries
to modify the retirement trend assumptions used for valuation purposes. Until PERA’s actuaries
have sufficient experience to determine the actuarial cost of the return-to-work provisions, it is
unknown what impact removal of the earnings limitation has had on the Fund. However, if rein-
statement of the PERA Act’s earnings limit for retirees who return to work triggers later retire-
ments, there may be a gain to the Fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
HB 16 will require PERA to make additional changes to the new pension software system that
PERA is implementing. For example, by incorporating removal of the PERA’s post-retirement
earning limit into the pension system, PERA incurred approximately $50,000 in software change
orders costs during FY05. If further revisions to the system are necessary in FY06, PERA will
be required to seek a BAR to cover the costs of these system changes.
Returning to an earnings limitation for retirees returning to work with affiliated-public employers
will alleviate the administrative requirements of accounting for nonrefundable retired member
pg_0003
House Bill 16 -- Page 3
contributions required when members post-retirement earnings reach $25,000.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
HB 207, introduced on behalf of the Legislative Finance Committee, proposes to impose a
$30,000 earnings limit for PERA retirees who return to work for public-affiliated employers for
those retired members who return-to-work on or after July 1, 2005. The bill grandfathers in re-
tirees who returned to work prior to July 1, 2005 under the provisions of the current statute.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
PERA Actuarial Position
Per PERA, for the period ending June 30, 2003, PERA’s unfunded liability grew significantly,
and the time to pay off its unfunded actuarially accrued liability (UAAL) increased from 10
years to 17 years. The June 30, 2004 actuarial valuation indicates that PERA funding resources
are sufficient to fund the Normal Cost and finance the UAAL over an aggregate period of 21
years. It should be noted, however, that the funding of assets uses a smoothing technique that
spreads investment gains and losses out over a 4-year period. One quarter of this year’s invest-
ment gain has been recognized in last fiscal year’s funding value and one quarter of it will be
recognized in each of the next 3 years. Past losses more than offset last year’s gain. In aggre-
gate, the system had an experience loss for the year ending June 30, 2004 of $474 million, due to
rate of return on funding value of assets less than assumed (3.8% vs. 8%) and retirements greater
than assumed. PERA’s actuaries report a loss of $186 million for past investment losses will
flow into the recognized gain/loss in next year’s actuarial valuation. If a loss of this magnitude
occurs next year, the effect would be that the overall PERA funding ratio will drop to 90% and
PERA’s overall UAAL will increase to approximately 30 years.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
Retirees who return to work with public-affiliated employers are required to remit nonrefundable
retired member contributions when their post-retirement earnings reach $25,000. Retired mem-
ber contributions will continue to be required through December 31, 2006, allowing for two full
years of actuarial experience to determine the full actuarial cost of PERA’s expanded return-to-
work provisions. Beginning January 1, 2007, the employer contribution rate will be adjusted an-
nually at the determination of PERA to cover the full actuarial cost of PERA retirees for post-
retirement employment with PERA affiliates.
GGG/yr