Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Cisneros |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Income Tax Relief and Raising Tax on Oil |
SB |
627 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
|
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|||
(1,250.0) |
1.500.0 |
4.400.0 |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC Files
Response
Received From
Taxation
and Revenue Department
SUMMARY
Senate Bill 627 provides income tax relief for
single parent households and for additional persons who are over 65 or
blind. It increases the oil and gas
school tax rate on oil and carbon dioxide production.
The tax relief provided for single parent households
is achieved by making income tax brackets and rates for “head of household”
filers the same as those for “married filing joint”.
Additional relief is provided for some elderly
by ending the current phase-out of the exemption for higher income taxpayers
who would now be provided a $2,500 exemption regardless of income. Currently, the exemptions (of $1,000.0) are completely
phased out at incomes greater than $28,500 for single individuals and $45
thousand for heads of households, surviving spouses and married individuals.
The emergency school tax amendments increase the
tax rate on oil and carbon dioxide from 3.15 percent of taxable value to 4.0
percent--the same rate imposed on gas production. The reduced rates provided for stripper wells
are increased proportionately.
The income tax provisions of the bill are
applicable beginning in 2004. The higher
rates for the emergency school tax are effective as of
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD’s report shows the
following impacts for the various components of the bill.
Provision |
Estimated Impact on
Revenues |
Subsequent |
|
|
||||||
|
FY 2004
|
FY 2005 |
Years |
Funds Affected |
|
|||||
|
Exemption for Seniors |
(1,000) |
(9,000) |
(7,000) |
General Fund |
|||||
|
Single parent relief |
(250) |
(4,500) |
(2,000) |
General Fund |
|||||
|
School tax increase |
None |
15,000 |
13,400 |
General Fund |
|||||
|
Total |
(1,250) |
1,500 |
4,400 |
General Fund |
|||||
The income tax provisions are shown decreasing
in subsequent years, reflecting the phased-in income tax reductions. The school tax provision is also shown
decreasing in subsequent years. This is
due to assumed lower oil prices.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD reports that the
administrative impacts are relatively minor and can be managed with existing
resources.
BT/lg